Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Book ReviewBOOK REVIEWS

Neuropsychology in the Courtroom: Expert Analysis of Reports and Testimony

Stephen I. Kramer
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online March 2009, 37 (1) 136-137;
Stephen I. Kramer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Edited by Robert L. Heilbronner. New York: The Guilford Press, 2008. 273 pp. $55.00.

This book serves as a sequel to the editor's previous volume, Forensic Neuropsychology Casebook, published in 2005. Both publications are primarily intended for graduate students in neuropsychology, although forensic psychiatry fellows, attorneys, and judges are also likely to benefit from reading this new contribution. Individual chapters are written by subspecialty neuropsychology experts who use a curious mixture of conversational tone and technical interpretation of neuropsychological test performance to illustrate concepts and to educate readers.

Heilbronner divides the text into three parts: case analyses, forensic case analyses with opposing expert reviews of the same materials, and special topics. Topics of interest to forensic psychiatrists include adult and child traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain injury, electrical brain injury, personal injury litigation, toxic torts, disability assessments, and independent educational evaluations.

Contributors comment on their individual methods of case review and forensic examination; this material lends a supervisory tone to the entire work. The analyses of specific neuropsychological tests and profiles are quite technical. Familiarity with the specific instruments is almost essential for readers to benefit optimally from the discussions; however, they should be relatively easy for the seasoned forensic neuropsychiatrist to follow.

There is considerable commentary about forensic practice ethics, confidentiality, Daubert challenges, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and neuropsychological report review that will reinforce basic concepts for the beginner, but may prove somewhat tedious for the more experienced forensic practitioner. Some authors display an entertaining degree of bravado as they recount the march to case settlement.

Two chapters devoted to multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome could have been combined to improve the introduction to the entity and to sharpen the authors' focus on disability claims review. On the other hand, separate chapters on opposing expert reviews of the same materials related to a case of minor traumatic brain injury are well-designed and quite instructive. The chapter on misdiagnosis of minor traumatic brain injury contains superb discussions about false-positive diagnoses and the psychometrics of test batteries. The chapter deserves a place on required reading lists for forensic fellows.

There are particularly excellent discussions for the novice forensic examiner, including: detecting incompetent reports, the effects of pain on neuropsychological test performance, the selection of fixed or flexible approaches to testing, the pitfalls of deficient analysis of case material, the development of questions for cross-examination, and the misdiagnosis of minor traumatic brain injury. Bibliographic references at the end of each chapter are sparing, though well selected, and include professional organization guidelines current to 2007.

Areas of concern include the occasional superficial discussion of neuropsychiatric disorders such as concussion, and chapters written by non-physician authors who stretch their scope of practice by offering specific medication recommendations. While this practice is often encountered in the clinical setting, it seems inappropriate as a model for trainees, practitioners, or forensic specialists. On balance, this book has much to offer clinically and pedagogically to forensic practitioners.

  • American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 37 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 37, Issue 1
March 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neuropsychology in the Courtroom: Expert Analysis of Reports and Testimony
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Neuropsychology in the Courtroom: Expert Analysis of Reports and Testimony
Stephen I. Kramer
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2009, 37 (1) 136-137;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Neuropsychology in the Courtroom: Expert Analysis of Reports and Testimony
Stephen I. Kramer
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2009, 37 (1) 136-137;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Postconcussion Syndrome: The New Evidence Base for Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Assessment of Malingered Neuropsychological Deficits
  • Trials of a Forensic Psychologist: A Casebook
Show more BOOK REVIEWS

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2021 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law