Abstract
Breaches of ethics are prevalent in biomedical publishing. Kapoor and colleagues identify several of the practical and ethics dilemmas that they have encountered in editing The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. Biomedical publishing ethics is continually evolving, with discrepant practice among different publications. Publication ethics apply to authors, editors, peer reviewers, journal publishers or owners, and their respective institutions. The Journal and the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL) would be enhanced by better formulating and elucidating its authorship requirements and relevant disclosures, both in print and online. The Journal could then serve as a leader in this arena.
Footnotes
-
Disclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: Dr. Wettstein was Editor of Behavioral Sciences and the Law from 1990 to 1996 and Associate Editor of the Bulletin/Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law from 1989 to 2003.
- © 2011 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law