TY - JOUR T1 - Commentary: <em>Helling v. Carey</em>, <em>Caveat Medicus</em> JF - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online JO - J Am Acad Psychiatry Law SP - 306 LP - 309 VL - 36 IS - 3 AU - D. Clay Kelly AU - Gina Manguno-Mire Y1 - 2008/09/01 UR - http://jaapl.org/content/36/3/306.abstract N2 - Forensic experts should be aware of the increasing importance of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in various legal settings. CPGs are a type of learned treatise and are accepted into court proceedings under hearsay exception provisions. The courts now use CPGs as shorthand for the standard of care in making malpractice determinations. However, medical guidelines can function as a sword or a shield in the courtroom arena. The Helling v. Carey medical malpractice case serves as a frightful reminder of the potential consequences of allowing courts to craft their own standards of medical care. ER -