PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Reena Kapoor
AU  - Howard Zonana
TI  - Forensic Evaluations and Mandated Reporting of Child Abuse
DP  - 2010 Mar 01
TA  - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
PG  - 49--56
VI  - 38
IP  - 1
4099  - http://jaapl.org/content/38/1/49.short
4100  - http://jaapl.org/content/38/1/49.full
SO  - J Am Acad Psychiatry Law2010 Mar 01; 38
AB  - Statutes requiring physicians to report suspected cases of child abuse create a potential conflict for psychiatrists working in the forensic setting. What happens in the case in which a forensic psychiatrist, during the course of an evaluation requested by a defense attorney, learns about child abuse perpetrated by the evaluee? A complicated legal, ethics-related, and interpersonal dilemma emerges. Reporting the abuse may contribute directly to further legal harm to the evaluee and place a strain on the relationship with the attorney. However, not reporting the abuse potentially involves ignoring a legal mandate and risking further harm to a child. This article first reviews mandated reporting statutes across the states. Next, the arguments for and against reporting are outlined. Existing solutions to the problem are reviewed, and several alternative solutions are explored. Finally, an approach to negotiating the dilemma that can be used by forensic psychiatrists in practice is suggested.