Table 5

Subgroup Analysis of Correlations Among Immature and Neurotic Defense Mechanisms and Vicarious Traumatization Scores

Spearman Coefficient for the Correlation Between TABS and Immature Defense Mechanism ScoresPSpearman Coefficient for the Correlation Between TABS and Neurotic Defense Mechanism ScoresP
Gender
    Male.50< .01.20.30
    Female.56< .01.43.02
Profession
    Psychiatrist.41.01.09.55
    Psychologist.62< .01.49.03
Length of forensic expertise
    > 10.5 y.50< .01.22.24
    ≤ 10.5 y.38.04.34.06
Previous Psychotherapy
    Yes.44< .01.27.04
    No.90.03.90.03
Psychotherapy expertise
    Yes.49< .01.23.18
    No.30.17.32.14
Time between forensic evaluation and study participation
    > 4.5 months.36.05.31.09
    ≤ 4.5 months.34.07.26.17
  • n = 56 participants.

  • Immature and neurotic defense mechanisms were evaluated with the Defensive Style Questionnaire (DSQ); vicarious trauma was evaluated with the Trauma and Attachment Belief Scale (TABS). The strength of correlation is classified as follows: .0–.19 = very weak; .20–39 = weak; .40–.59 = moderate; .60–.79 = strong; .8–1.0 = very strong.