Table 2

PAD Completion Correlates: Cross-Site Analyses of Characteristics Associated With Having PADs

Bivariate AssociationsDomain ModelsFinal Model
Common OR95% CIAdjusted OR95% CIAdjusted OR95% CI
Model 1: Demographics and social environment
    Age above median (>44 y)1.09(0.66–1.81)
    Female0.89(0.54–1.48)
    Nonwhite0.75(0.44–1.27)
    Cohabitation0.99(0.53–1.88)
    Some college education1.93(0.87–4.30)
Marital status/involuntary commitment interaction
        Single and no involuntary commitment [comparison][1.00]
        Married and no involuntary commitment0.23(0.03–1.70)0.21(0.03–1.59)
        Single with involuntary commitment1.06(0.61–1.85)0.97(0.55–1.69)
        Married with involuntary commitment2.43(1.16–5.11)*2.21(1.04–4.67)*
    Housing categories
        Independent living[1.00]
        Homeless2.47(0.79–7.70)
        Living with family1.10(0.50–2.42)
        Staffed residence1.05(0.58–1.90)
    Income above median (>$700)1.05(0.61–1.80)
    Social support1.04(0.56–1.95)
    Social support for treatment1.92(1.12–3.30)*1.88(1.08–3.25)*
    Model significanceLR = 15.13, df = 4**
Model 2: Clinical variable model
    Psychotic disorder1.20(0.73–1.96)
    Substance abuse1.45(0.81–2.60)
    BPRS score above median (>30)1.48(0.89–2.47)
    GAF score above median (>47)0.63(0.36–1.10)
    Insight score above median (>18)1.93(1.12–3.34)*1.88(1.08–3.28)*2.06(1.17–3.66)*
    Self harm1.29(0.77–2.16)
    Model significanceLR = 18.08, df = 2***
Model 3: Treatment and systems utilization
    Past hospitalizations above median (>3)1.67(0.99–2.83)
    Time in treatment above median (>20 y)1.25(0.75–2.08)
    Picked up by the police in past 6 mo (treatment)2.94(1.46–5.95)**3.05(1.50–6.21)**2.25(1.08–4.71)*
    Picked up by the police in past 6 mo (arrest)2.29(0.92–5.69)
    Outpatients visits above median (>2 monthly)0.84(0.48–1.49)
    Involuntary commitment1.14(0.65–1.99)
    Treatment satisfaction above median (>52)1.21(0.74–2.00)
    Drug Attitudes Inventory above median (>8)1.24(0.75–2.04)
    Medication compliance above median (>3)0.89(0.53–1.50)
    Appointment compliance above median (>3)1.10(0.62–1.95)
    Model significanceLR = 7.86, df = 1**
Model 4: Leverage model
    Outpatient commitment1.59(0.85–2.97)
    Criminal justice leverage1.48(0.85–2.58)
    Representative payee3.61(2.03–6.42)***3.07(1.70–5.56)***3.32(1.81–6.09)***
    Housing1.81(1.09–3.00)*
    Pressure to take medications above median (>1)1.54(0.93–2.53)
    Pressure to keep appointments above median (>1)2.26(1.37–3.74)**1.97(1.16–3.32)*1.79(1.05–3.05)*
    Perceived coercion above median (>7.23)1.58(0.96–2.60)
    Autonomy above median (>24)0.75(0.43–1.28)
    Model significanceLR = 23.26, df = 2***LR = 34.38, df = 4****
  • A common odds ratio with cluster-corrected confidence interval is given only if all five sites’ odds ratios were determined by Zelen’s test (p < 0.05) to represent a sampling distribution from a common population. Results were produced by logistic regression.

  • p < 0.10 (trend);

  • * p < .05;

  • ** p < .01;

  • *** p < .001;

  • **** p < .0001.