Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 16, Issue 3, Part A, July 2002, Pages 696-703
NeuroImage

Regular Article
Functional Networks in Emotional Moral and Nonmoral Social Judgments

https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1118Get rights and content

Abstract

Reading daily newspaper articles often evokes opinions and social judgments about the characters and stories. Social and moral judgments rely on the proper functioning of neural circuits concerned with complex cognitive and emotional processes. To examine whether dissociable neural systems mediate emotionally charged moral and nonmoral social judgments, we used a visual sentence verification task in conjunction with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We found that a network comprising the medial orbitofrontal cortex, the temporal pole and the superior temporal sulcus of the left hemisphere was specifically activated by moral judgments. In contrast, judgment of emotionally evocative, but non-moral statements activated the left amygdala, lingual gyri, and the lateral orbital gyrus. These findings provide new evidence that the orbitofrontal cortex has dedicated subregions specialized in processing specific forms of social behavior.

References (49)

  • A. Bechara et al.

    Characterization of the decision-making efect of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions

    Brain

    (2000)
  • R.J.R. Blair

    Brief report: Morality in the autistic child

    J. Autism Dev. Disord.

    (1996)
  • G. Bottini et al.

    The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study

    Brain

    (1994)
  • L. Brothers

    Friday's Footprint. How Society Shapes The Human Mind

    (1997)
  • M.C. Brower et al.

    Neuropsychiatry of frontal lobe dysfunction in violent criminal behavior: A critical review

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • A. Colby et al.

    The Measurement of Moral Judgment

    (1990)
  • A.R. Damasio et al.

    Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions

    Nature Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • G.I. de Zubicaray et al.

    The semantic interference effect in the picture-word paradigm: An event-related fMRI study employing overt responses

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (2001)
  • L. Eisenberg

    The social construction of the human brain

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (1995)
  • P.J. Eslinger et al.

    Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: Patient EVR

    Neurology

    (1985)
  • L. Fisher et al.

    Cognitive impairment and its relationship to psychopathic tendencies in children with emotional and behavioral difficulties

    J. Abnorm. Child Psychol.

    (1998)
  • F. Flynn et al.

    Altered behavior associated with damage to the ventromedial hypothalamus: A distinctive syndrome

    Behavioral Neurol.

    (1988)
  • S.D. Forman et al.

    Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): Use of a cluster-sized threshold

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1995)
  • C.D. Frith et al.

    Interacting minds—A biological basis

    Science

    (1999)
  • Cited by (366)

    • The “(a)moral brain”: When things go wrong

      2023, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    • Cognitive control and dishonesty

      2022, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several early fMRI studies investigating moral judgments [32–34] show that regions associated with self-referential thinking, such as the (ventro)medial prefrontal cortex [(v)mPFC], temporal poles, and superior temporal sulcus, exhibit stronger responses to moral dilemmas as compared to neutral scenarios. It has been suggested that engagement of this self-referential thinking network may be associated with prosocial moral sentiments [32–36], which may arise automatically when exposed to an opportunity to be unfair or (dis)honest, thus supporting the Grace hypothesis. Evidence favoring moral grace, thus that honesty is the default and that straying from the straight and narrow requires cognitive control, is provided by behavioral research demonstrating that people react faster when asked to tell the truth as compared to lying [37,38] and are more honest, cooperative, and prosocial under time pressure [39,40].

    • Amygdala function in emotion, cognition, and behavior

      2022, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    • Contemporary neuroethics

      2021, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience: Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text