Skip to main content
Log in

Legal remedies for spousal abuse: Victim characteristics, expectations, and satisfaction

Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since 1980 legal remedies for spouse abuse have been established in various forms in every state. Social service agencies and shelters currently encourage victims to utilize restraining orders which now carry criminal consequences for the batterer, yet little empirical data have been reported concerning their use. The present paper describes two research studies-one conducted in Dane County (Madison area), Wisconsin, the other in Sacramento County, California-that provide new helpful information for these referring agencies and offer findings which reflect which victims use these legal remedies, what their expectations are, and how satisfied the victims were with the results. A final section discusses implications for change or clarification in policy, process, and education on the use of these legal remedies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bannon, J. D. (1975, August).Law enforcement problems with intra-family violence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Bar Association, Montreal.

  • Bard, M. (1971).The study and modification of intra-familial violence. The control of aggression and violence, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard, M., and Zacker, J. (1974). Assaultiveness and alcohol use in family disputes: Police perceptions.Criminology, 12, 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilin, A. L. (1983). An exploration of victim utilization, expectations and satisfaction with domestic abuse restraining orders. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertion, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Breslin, W. J. (1978). Police intervention in domestic confrontations.J. Police Sci. Admin. 6: 293–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. V. (1984). Beliefs of service providers about abused women and abusing men.Social Work 29: 243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbert, S. E., and Micklow, P. L. (1976). The assaulted wife: ‘Catch 22’ revisited.Women's Rights Law Rep. 3: 138–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. J. (1980). How families with violent members can be helped. Paper presented at the White House Conference on Families for the National Council on Family Relations.

  • Gelles, R. J. (1976). Abuse wives: Why do they stay?J. Marriage Fam. 38: 659–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. J., and Cornell, C. P. (1985).Intimate Violence in Families, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1977).Policing a Free Society, Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herskowitz, L. (1966). Tort liability between husband and wife: The interspousal immunity doctrine.Miami Law Review.

  • Jensen, R. H. (1978). Battered women and the law.Victimol. Int. J. 2: 585–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, A. F. (1983). Community responses to battered women.Victimo. Int. J. 7: 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labell, L. S. (1979). Wife abuse: A sociologicl study of battered women and their mates.Victimol. Int. J. 4: 258–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, L. G. (1981). Prosecution of spouse abuse: Innovations in criminal justice response. Washington, D. C.: Center for Women Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, L. G., Landis, L., and Goldzweig, S. (1981). State legislation on domestic violence.Res. Viol. Fam. 4: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart, L. L. (1985). Methodological issues in comparative racial analyses: The case of wife abuse.Social Work Res. Abstr. 21: 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newberger, E. H., and Bourne, R. (1978), The medicalization and legalization of child abuse.Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 48: 593–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnas, R. I. (1967). The police response to the domestic disturbance.Wisc. Law Rev. 914–960.

  • Parnas, R. (1970). Judicial response to intrafamily violence.Min. Law Rev. 54: 585–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1980).Qualitative Evaluation Methods, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (1978). Police and the battered wife: The search for understanding.Police Magazine, 1, 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R., and McEvoy, J. (1970). Middle class violence.Psychology Today 4: 52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, S. K., and Straus, M. A. (1974),Violence in the Family, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1974). Foreward. In Gelles, R. J. (eds.),The Violent Home: Study of Physical Aggression between Husbands and Wives, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strube, M. J. and Barbour, L. S. (1984). Factors related to the decision to leave an abusive relationship,J. Marriage Fam. 46: 837–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1979).The Battered Women, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horton, A.L., Simonidis, K.M. & Simonidis, L.L. Legal remedies for spousal abuse: Victim characteristics, expectations, and satisfaction. J Fam Viol 2, 265–279 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976544

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976544

Key words

Navigation