Abstract
Background
Seclusion and restraint are frequent but controversial coercive measures used in psychiatric treatment. Legislative efforts have started to emerge to control the use of these measures in many countries. In the present study, the nationwide trends in the use of seclusion and restraint were investigated in Finland over a 15-year span which was characterised by legislative changes aiming to clarify and restrict the use of these measures.
Method
The data were collected during a predetermined week in 1990, 1991, 1994, 1998 and 2004, using a structured postal survey of Finnish psychiatric hospitals. The numbers of inpatients during the study weeks were obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Register.
Results
The total number of the secluded and restrained patients declined as did the number of all inpatients during the study weeks, but the risk of being secluded or restrained remained the same over time when compared to the first study year. The duration of the restraint incidents did not change, but the duration of seclusion increased. A regional variation was found in the use of coercive measures.
Conclusion
Legislative changes solely cannot reduce the use of seclusion and restraint or change the prevailing treatment cultures connected with these measures. The use of seclusion and restraint should be vigilantly monitored and ethical questions should be under continuous scrutiny.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Act on the Status and Rights of patients (2004) So 422. In: Suomen Laki II [Finnish Law II]. Talentum Media Oy, Helsinki, pp 1621–1624
Angold A (1989) Seclusion. Br J Psychiatry 154:437–444
Betemps EJ, Somoza E, Buncher CR (1993) Hospital characteristics, diagnoses, and staff reasons associated with use of seclusion and restraint. Hosp Community Psychiatry 44:367–371
Brown JS, Tooke SK (1992) On the seclusion of psychiatric patients. Soc Sci Med 35:711–721
Council of Europe (1994) Recommendation 1235 on psychiatry and human rights. Council of Europe, Strasbourg
Council of Europe (2004) Recommendation Rec(2004)10 of the committee of ministers to member states concerning the protection of the human rights and dignity of persons with mental disorder and its explanatory memorandum. Council of Europe, Strasbourg
Crenshaw WB, Cain KA, Francis PS (1997) An updated national survey on seclusion and restraint. Psychiatr Serv 48:395–397
Currier GW, Farley-Toombs C (2002) Datapoints: use of restraint before and after implementation of the new HCFA rules. Psychiatr Serv 53:138
Donat DC (2003) An analysis of successful efforts to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint at a public psychiatric hospital. Psychiatr Serv 54:1119–1123
Donovan A, Plant R, Peller A, Siegel L, Martin A (2003) Two-year trends in the use of seclusion and restraint among psychiatrically hospitalized youths. Psychiatr Serv 54:987–993
D’Orio BM, Purselle D, Stevens D, Garlow SJ (2004) Reduction of episodes of seclusion and restraint in a psychiatric emergency system. Psychiatr Serv 55:581–583
Fisher WA (1994) Seclusion and restraint: a review of the literature. Am J Psychiatry 151:1584–1591
Flannery RB, Juliano J, Cronin S, Walker AP (2006) Characteristics of assaultive psychiatric patients: fifteen-year analysis of the assaulted staff action program (ASAP). Psychiatr Q 77:239–249
Jonikas JA, Cook JA, Rosen C, Laris A, Kim J-B (2004) Brief reports: a program to reduce use of physical restraint in psychiatric inpatient facilities. Psychiatr Serv 55:818–820
Korkeila J (1998) Perspectives on the public psychiatric services in Finland. Stakes, research report 93. Gummerus Printing, Jyväskylä, Finland
Korkeila J, Tuohimäki C, Kaltiala-Heino R, Lehtinen V, Joukamaa M (2002) Predicting use of coercive measures in Finland. Nord J Psychiatry 56:339–345
Lendemeijer B, Shortridge-Baggett L (1997) The use of seclusion in psychiatry: a literature review. Sch Inq Nurs Pract 11:299–315
McCrue RE, Urcuyo L, Lilu Y (2004) Reducing restraint use in a public psychiatric inpatient service. J Behav Health Serv Res 31:217–224
Mental Health Act (2004) So 409. In: Suomen Laki II. [Finnish Law II]. Talentum Media Oy, Helsinki, pp 1598–1605
Niveau G (2004) Preventing human rights abuses in psychiatric establishments: the work of the CPT. Eur Psychiatry 19:146–154
Okin RL (1985) Variation among state hospitals in use of seclusion and restraint. Hosp Community Psychiatry 36:648–652
Pirkola S, Sohlman B (eds) (2005) Atlas of mental health – statistics from Finland. National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health (Stakes), Helsinki, Finland
Sailas E, Fenton M (2000) Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD001163
Sailas E, Wahlbeck K (2005) Seclusion and restraint in psychiatric inpatient wards. Curr Opin Psychiatry 18:555–559
Salib E, Ahmed AG, Cope M (1998) Practice of seclusion: a five-year retrospective review in North Cheshire. Med Sci Law 38:321–327
Way BB, Banks SM (1990) Use of seclusion and restraint in public psychiatric hospitals: patient characteristics and facility effects. Hosp Community Psychiatry 41:75–81
World Psychiatric Association (1996) Declaration of Madrid. 10th World Congress of Psychiatry, Madrid, Spain
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keski-Valkama, A., Sailas, E., Eronen, M. et al. A 15-year national follow-up: legislation is not enough to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 42, 747–752 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0219-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0219-7