Skip to main content
Log in

The Fertility of Hebephiles and the Adaptationist Argument Against Including Hebephilia in DSM-5

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blanchard, R., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., & Cantor, J. M. (2010). Sexual attraction to others: A comparison of two models of alloerotic responding in men. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., …, Klassen, P. E. (2009). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 335–350.

  • Franklin, K. (2009). The public policy implications of “hebephilia”: A response to Blanchard et al. (2008) [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 319–320.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ray Blanchard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blanchard, R. The Fertility of Hebephiles and the Adaptationist Argument Against Including Hebephilia in DSM-5. Arch Sex Behav 39, 817–818 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9610-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9610-7

Keywords

Navigation