The effects of the z-score transformation on measures of relative erectile response strength: A re-appraisal
References (18)
- et al.
Deviant sexual arousal in rapists
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1979) - et al.
Sexual responses to consenting and forced sex in a large sample of rapists and nonrapists
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1986) Diagnosing homo- or heterosexuality and erotic age-preference by means of a psychophysiological test
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1967)- et al.
The components of rapist's sexual arousal
Archives of General Psychiatry
(1977) - et al.
A single transducer for measuring penile erection with comment on its use in the treatment of sexual deviates
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1966) - et al.
Erectile responses among heterosexual child molesters, father-daughter incest offenders, and matched non-offenders: five distinct age preference profil
Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science
(1989) - et al.
The reliability of the rape index in a sample of rapists and nonrapists
Violence and Victims
(1989) A simple method of drawing a sample without replacement
Applied Statistics
(1975)- et al.
The reliability of the Rape Index: a rapist sample
Behavioral Assessment
(1985)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (21)
Standardization of Penile Plethysmography Testing in Assessment of Problematic Sexual Interests
2015, Journal of Sexual MedicineCitation Excerpt :This can be addressed by using a ROC curve, to provide information about the magnitude of the erection during the time of the stimulus presentation. One concern noted by Barbaree and Mewhort is that z‐score transformations distort information inherent in the raw data and may also increase random error [41]. There is clinical and academic debate regarding what constitutes significant changes in penile circumference to indicate sexual arousal.
Penile Plethysmography
2014, Toolkit for Working with Juvenile Sex OffendersPhallometric testing with sexual offenders: Limits to its value
2000, Clinical Psychology Review
Copyright © 1994 Published by Elsevier Ltd.