Evaluating fitness to stand trial: A comparative analysis of fit and unfit defendants

https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(81)90025-XGet rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (18)

  • S.N. Akhtar

    Pre-trial evaluation of court referrals

    Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal

    (1971)
  • J. Arboleda-Florez et al.

    A two-year review of court examinations

    Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal

    (1975)
  • G. Cooke

    The court study unit: Patient characteristics and differences between patients judged competent and incompetent

    Journal of Clinical Psychology

    (1969)
  • C. Greenland et al.

    Remands for psychiatric examinations in Ontario, 1969–1970

    Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal

    (1972)
  • K.B. Jobson

    Commitment and release of the mentally ill under criminal law

    Criminal Law Quarterly

    (1969)
  • R. Kunjukrishnan

    Ten year survey of pretrial examinations in Saskatchewan

    Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

    (1979)
  • P.S. Lindsay

    Fitness to stand trial: An overview in light of the recommendations of the Law Reform Commission of Canada

    Criminal Law Quarterly

    (1977)
  • A.L. McGarry

    Competency for trial and due process via the state hospital

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (1965)
  • R.J. Menzies et al.

    The outcome of forensic psychiatric assessment: A study of remands in six Canadian cities

    Criminal Justice and Behavior

    (1980)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (31)

  • Forensic psychiatric services in British Columbia

    2000, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
  • A Meta-Analytic review of competency to stand trial research

    2011, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
View all citing articles on Scopus

This research was supported by grants from the Department of the Solicitor General of Canada and from the British Columbia Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission. The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Department or the Commission.

View full text