Original articleRelative performance of the mast, vast, and cage versus DSM-III-R criteria for alcohol dependence☆
References (28)
- et al.
Screening for current drug use disorders in alcoholics: an application of receiver operator characteristic analysis
Drug Alcohol Dependence
(1988) Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test: the quest for a new diagnostic instrument
Am J Psychiatry
(1971)- et al.
The brief MAST: a shortened version of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test
Am J Psychiatry
(1972) - et al.
The use of a self-administered alcoholism screening test (SAAST) in a medical center
- et al.
Identifying the “hidden alcoholic”
- et al.
Validation of the Veterans Alcoholism Screening Test
J Stud Alcohol
(1982) - et al.
Performance of screening and diagnostic tests: application of receiver operating characteristic analysis
Arch Gen Psychiatry
(1987) - et al.
The Composite International Diagnostic Interview: an epidemiologic instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures
Arch Gen Psychiatry
(1988) The prevalence of alcoholism in a community general hospital
Am J Psychiatry
(1971)The diagnosis of alcoholism in a psychiatric hospital: a trial of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST)
Am J Psychiatry
(1972)
A factor analytic study of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test
Psychol Rep
Comparative effectiveness of self and family forms of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test
J Stud Alcohol
The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test: application in a general military hospital
Q J Stud Alcohol
Factor structure of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test
J Stud Alcohol
Cited by (84)
Short-Form Mini Nutritional Assessment as a useful method of predicting the development of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery
2016, General Hospital PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :Functional status was evaluated using the Barthel Index (score range, 0–100: 0 = completely dependent, 100 = completely independent) and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) scale (score range, 0–8: 0 = completely independent, 8 = completely dependent) [25, 26]. Alcohol use was assessed using the CAGE questionnaire [27]. The CAGE questionnaire, the name of which is acronym of its four questions.
Addiction screening and diagnostic tools: 'Refuting' and 'unmasking' claims to legitimacy
2015, International Journal of Drug PolicyCitation Excerpt :Together, the CAGE, MAST and AUDIT tools are variously described as ‘common’ (Dhalla & Kopec, 2007, p. 33) or the ‘most popular’ (Hays, Merz & Nicholas, 1995, p. 277) alcohol screening tools. Magruder-Habib, Stevens, and Alling (1993, p. 435) confidently describe the ‘widespread use and acceptance’ of these tools as ‘gold standards’. These are the tools most frequently evaluated in reviews and tend to be the tools endorsed by authoritative expert sources (Allen & Wilson, 2003; Haber et al., 2009).
Social and psychological resources and health outcomes after the World Trade Center disaster
2006, Social Science and MedicineValidity of the CAGE questionnaire in hospital
2005, European PsychiatryDrug addiction and alcoholism as predictors for tuberculosis treatment default in Brazil: A prospective cohort study
2017, Epidemiology and Infection
- ☆
Paper presented at the 15th Annual Alcohol Epidemiology Symposium, The Kettil Bruun Society for Social and Epidemiologic Research on Alcohol, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 11–16 June 1989. This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Alcohol and Alcohol Abuse (ROI-AA-07138).