Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 355, Issue 9204, 19 February 2000, Page 632
The Lancet

News
Internet addiction: genuine diagnosis or not?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)72500-9Get rights and content

References (0)

Cited by (148)

  • Behavioral addiction

    2023, Encyclopedia of Mental Health, Third Edition: Volume 1-3
  • Croatian validation of the Compulsive Internet Use Scale

    2021, Addictive Behaviors
    Citation Excerpt :

    CIU disrupts daily activities that, in turn, produce negative consequences such as social withdrawal, self-neglect, poor diet and family problems (Block, 2008; Cash, Rae, Steel, & Winkler, 2012; Flisher, 2010; Bernardi & Pallanti, 2009; Suler, 1999; Widyanto & Griffiths, 2006). Additionally, Internet use has an impact on structural and functional changes in the brain (Kim et al., 2011; Mitchell, 2000). Among Internet dependent adolescents, a decrease in grey matter density (Zhou et al., 2011) and multiple microstructure abnormalities (Yuan et al., 2011) have been found.

  • Social media addiction: Applying the DEMATEL approach

    2019, Telematics and Informatics
    Citation Excerpt :

    While the term “Internet Addiction” was first introduced by Goldberg (1996), the psychiatrist Young (1996) registered this area of research under her name with the first report of Pathological Internet Use (PIU) observed in a forty-three years old householder with more than sixty hours of being online per week. Afterward, several researchers started to contribute to the body of knowledge by investigating various types of Internet Addiction (IA) and PIU disorders (e.g., Griffiths, 2000; Hardie and Tee, 2007; Jun and Choi, 2015; Kuss and Griffiths, 2015; Mitchell, 2000; Pantic et al., 2017; Young, 1998). Regardless of the proliferation of studies in these areas, the status of PIU/IA is still unknown in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text