Special section: Original articleNeuropsychologic and Functional Outcome After Complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Section snippets
Participants
Data were provided from 229 participants who were enrolled in the Southeastern Michigan Traumatic Brain Injury System (SEMTBIS), a participating center in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems (TBIMS) project. Inclusion criteria for the TBIMS project require that participants (1) be at least 16 years of age at the time of injury, (2) arrived at a TBIMS level I trauma center within 24 hours of injury, (3) received both acute care and inpatient rehabilitation in hospitals designated as TBIMS
Results
Independent t tests and chi-square analyses of demographic factors showed no statistically significant differences (P>.05) between the complicated mild TBI and moderate TBI groups on level of education (Fisher exact test, P=.081), sex (Fisher exact test, P=.622), ethnicity (χ32,N=229=2.56), or marital status (χ52N=229=5.19). Conversely, the complicated mild TBI group was significantly older than the moderate TBI group (t227=6.18, P<.001).
Comparison of injury severity characteristics, including
Discussion
Results of the current study support the hypothesis of similar levels of cognitive and functional outcome between complicated mild TBI and moderate TBI patients soon after injury. Unexpectedly, the finding of equivalent functional dependence and similar levels of cognitive impairment at 1 year postinjury did not support the hypothesis of better outcome after complicated mild TBI in the longer term. Overall, this study showed few differences in outcome between patients with mild TBI complicated
Conclusions
The current study extends findings of short-term cognitive and functional outcome after complicated mild TBI and provides a preliminary view of longer-term recovery. Sufficient parallels in outcome after complicated mild TBI and moderate TBI were found to indicate that when classifying severity of TBI based on GCS scores, consideration of a moderate injury designation should be given to persons with an intracranial bleed and a GCS score between 13 and 15.
References (44)
- et al.
Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2004) - et al.
Assessment of coma and impaired consciousnessA practical scale
Lancet
(1974) - et al.
A longitudinal, controlled study of patient complaints following treated mild traumatic brain injury
Arch Clin Neuropsychol
(2004) - et al.
The management of mild and moderate head injuries
Neurosurg Clin N Am
(1991) - et al.
Assessment outcome after severe brain damage
Lancet
(1975) - et al.
Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community based individuals
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2001) - et al.
The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(1994) - et al.
The Community Integration Questionnaire revisited: an assessment of factor structure and validity
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(1999) - et al.
Measures of executive functioning as predictors of functional ability and social integration in a rehabilitation sample
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(1999) Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury
JAMA
(1999)
One year psychosocial outcome in head injury
J Int Neuropsychol Soc
A multicenter longitudinal investigation of return to work and community integration following traumatic brain injury
J Head Trauma Rehabil
Neuropsychologic and psychosocial consequences of minor head injury
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
Neurobehavioral outcome of minor head injury: a three center study
J Neurosurg
Factors influencing outcome following mild traumatic brain injury in adults
J Int Neuropsychol Soc
High-risk mild head injury
J Neurosurg
Mild head injury classification
Neurosurgery
Cognitive and neurobehavioral functioning after mild versus moderate traumatic brain injury in older adults
J Int Neuropsychol Soc
Cognitive and affective sequelae in complicated and uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury
Brain Inj
A randomized trial of two treatments for mild traumatic brain injury
Brain Inj
Rehabilitation programs for patients with mild head injury: components, problems, and evaluation
J Head Trauma Rehabil
A review of mild head trauma: part IMeta-analytic review of neuropsychological studies
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol
Cited by (211)
Development and description of SAAM intervention: A brief, multidimensional and psycho-educational intervention for adults with mild traumatic brain injury
2021, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineThe effect of foot massage on the level of consciousness and delirium of intensive care patients: A randomized single-blind controlled trial
2021, Journal of Bodywork and Movement TherapiesLingering Symptoms Following Sports-Related Brain Injury
2024, JAMA Network OpenDevelopment and validation of a risk prediction nomogram for disposition of acute clozapine intoxicated patients to intensive care unit
2023, Human and Experimental ToxicologyCognitive Outcome After Complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
2023, Journal of Neurotrauma
Supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant no. H133A020515).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.