Elsevier

Computers in Human Behavior

Volume 23, Issue 6, November 2007, Pages 3038-3056
Computers in Human Behavior

The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: “On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Dog”

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.09.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The growth of the Internet at a means of communication has sparked the interest of researchers in several fields (e.g. communication, social psychology, industrial-organizational psychology) to investigate the issues surrounding the expression of different social behaviors in this unique social context. Of special interest to researchers is the increased importance that anonymity seems to play in computer-mediated communication (CMC). This paper reviews the literature related to the issues of anonymity within the social context, particularly in CMC, demonstrating the usefulness of established social psychological theory to explain behavior in CMC and discussing the evolution of the current theoretical explanations in explaining the effects of anonymity in social behavior in CMC environments. Several suggestions for future research are proposed in an attempt to provide researchers with new avenues to investigate how anonymity can play both positive and negative roles in CMC.

Section snippets

Definitions of anonymity

The construct of anonymity has long been of interest to social psychologists and other social scientists. Anonymity has traditionally been conceived as the inability of others to identify an individual or for others to identify one’s self. This may be within a large social context, such as a crowd, or in smaller context, such as two-person communications over the Internet. However, it has been suggested that there are really two broad categories of anonymity: technical anonymity and social

Positive and negative effects of anonymity

Today’s current events concerning the uses of CMC by individuals, including e-mail, blogs, and social networking sites such as My Space and Facebook, have brought attention to the importance of the effect of anonymity in CMC. To understand the effects of anonymity in interpersonal interactions we must look at how anonymity can influence communications at both the individual level and the group level. Several past social psychological concepts can explain how anonymity can result in either

Theories of anonymity in FtF environments

One of the most influential theories describing the effect of anonymity on behavior is Zimbardo’s (1969) deindividuation theory. The deindividuated state was described as a state in which individuals within a group are not “seen or paid attention to as individuals” (Festinger, Pepitone, & Newcomb, 1952, p. 382). Thus, under the anonymity provided by being a member of a crowd, it was predicted that when “under conditions where the member is not individuated in the group, there is likely to occur

Theories of anonymity in CMC environments

Since the early 1990s researchers have begun to explore the effects on anonymity on CMC in much further detail, taking into account some of the special features of the Internet that are not available in FtF communications (e.g. lack of visual and auditory cues, asynchronous communication, isolation from those that one is communicating with) and most researchers in this area have agreed that new theories of interpersonal behavior are required to more fully explain and understand how anonymity

The social use of technology

The equalization theory and SIDE theory describe the effects of anonymity have helped to explain and predict how individuals will use anonymity in CMC. Other theories have also been developed to help describe how technology itself can influence social behavior. These theories have primarily been applied to organizational studies of business communications but have relevance to other social uses of technology. One theory that could have dramatic importance in investigating the effects of

Conclusion

In sum, anonymity has been of interest to social researchers for many decades. The changing face of social communication has lead to the proliferation of the use of computer technology as an important form of interpersonal communication. Because CMC affords many more possibilities to keep oneself anonymous, it is important to understand how these technologies provide anonymity to users and how users of these technologies utilize anonymity. Some of these uses can be of a positive nature, such as

References (68)

  • I. Altman

    The environment and social behavior

    (1975)
  • J.L. Berdahl et al.

    Equality of participation and influence in groups: the effects of communication medium and sex composition

    Computer-Supported Cooperative Work

    (1996)
  • J.M. Darley et al.

    Bystander intervention on emergencies: diffusion of responsibility

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1968)
  • E. DeCarlo

    Murder, she read

    New York Magazine

    (1998)
  • G.L. DeSanctis et al.

    A foundation for the study of group decision support systems

    Management Science

    (1987)
  • G. DeSanctis et al.

    Capturing complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory

    Organization Science

    (1994)
  • E. Diener

    Deindividuation, self-awareness, and disinhibition

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1979)
  • E. Diener

    Deindividuation: the absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members

  • E. Diener et al.

    Effects of deindividuation variables among Halloween trick-or-treaters

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1976)
  • V.J. Dubrovsky et al.

    The equalization phenomenon: status effect in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups

    Human–Computer Interaction

    (1991)
  • J.J. Everett et al.

    Effects of team cohesion and identifiability on social loafing in relay swimming performance

    International Journal of Sport Psychology

    (1992)
  • L. Festinger et al.

    Some consequences of de-individuation in a group

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1952)
  • A.J. Flanagin et al.

    Computer-mediated group work: the interaction of member sex and anonymity

    Communication Research

    (2002)
  • D. Glaser

    The effectiveness of a prison and parole system

    (1964)
  • D. Haraway

    A manifesto for cyborgs: science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1908’s

  • E. Hatfield et al.

    Mirror, mirror… The importance of looks in everyday life

    (1986)
  • M.H. Heffron

    The naval ship as an urban design problem

    Naval Engineers Journal

    (1972)
  • S. Herring

    Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication

    Electronic Journal of Communication

    (1993)
  • A.B. Hollingshead

    Information suppression and status persistence in group decision-making: the effects of communication media

    Human Communication Research

    (1996)
  • C.Y.D. Hoeksema-van Orden et al.

    Social loafing under fatigue

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1998)
  • M. Hunt

    The story of psychology

    (1993)
  • D.J. Isenberg

    Group polarization: a critical review and meta-analysis

    Journal of Personality Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • L. Jessup et al.

    Toward a theory of automated group work: the de-individuating effects of anonymity

    Small Group Research

    (1990)
  • A.N. Joinson

    Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: the role of self-awareness and visual anonymity

    European Journal of Social Psychology

    (2000)
  • Cited by (280)

    • Public perception of electric vehicles on Reddit and Twitter: A cross-platform analysis

      2023, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Steiner, P. (July 5, 1993). New Yorker cartoon, p. 61.

    View full text