The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: “On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Dog”☆
Section snippets
Definitions of anonymity
The construct of anonymity has long been of interest to social psychologists and other social scientists. Anonymity has traditionally been conceived as the inability of others to identify an individual or for others to identify one’s self. This may be within a large social context, such as a crowd, or in smaller context, such as two-person communications over the Internet. However, it has been suggested that there are really two broad categories of anonymity: technical anonymity and social
Positive and negative effects of anonymity
Today’s current events concerning the uses of CMC by individuals, including e-mail, blogs, and social networking sites such as My Space and Facebook, have brought attention to the importance of the effect of anonymity in CMC. To understand the effects of anonymity in interpersonal interactions we must look at how anonymity can influence communications at both the individual level and the group level. Several past social psychological concepts can explain how anonymity can result in either
Theories of anonymity in FtF environments
One of the most influential theories describing the effect of anonymity on behavior is Zimbardo’s (1969) deindividuation theory. The deindividuated state was described as a state in which individuals within a group are not “seen or paid attention to as individuals” (Festinger, Pepitone, & Newcomb, 1952, p. 382). Thus, under the anonymity provided by being a member of a crowd, it was predicted that when “under conditions where the member is not individuated in the group, there is likely to occur
Theories of anonymity in CMC environments
Since the early 1990s researchers have begun to explore the effects on anonymity on CMC in much further detail, taking into account some of the special features of the Internet that are not available in FtF communications (e.g. lack of visual and auditory cues, asynchronous communication, isolation from those that one is communicating with) and most researchers in this area have agreed that new theories of interpersonal behavior are required to more fully explain and understand how anonymity
The social use of technology
The equalization theory and SIDE theory describe the effects of anonymity have helped to explain and predict how individuals will use anonymity in CMC. Other theories have also been developed to help describe how technology itself can influence social behavior. These theories have primarily been applied to organizational studies of business communications but have relevance to other social uses of technology. One theory that could have dramatic importance in investigating the effects of
Conclusion
In sum, anonymity has been of interest to social researchers for many decades. The changing face of social communication has lead to the proliferation of the use of computer technology as an important form of interpersonal communication. Because CMC affords many more possibilities to keep oneself anonymous, it is important to understand how these technologies provide anonymity to users and how users of these technologies utilize anonymity. Some of these uses can be of a positive nature, such as
References (68)
- et al.
Destroy the scum, and then neuter their families: the web forum as a vehicle for community discourse?
The Social Science Journal
(2004) - et al.
Attribution accuracy when using anonymity in group support systems
International Journal of Human–Computer Studies
(1997) - et al.
Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context
Leadership Quarterly
(2003) - et al.
Group decision making and communication technology
Organizational behavior and Human Decision Processes
(1992) Social cues in computer-mediated negotiations: gender makes a difference
Computers in Human Behavior
(1991)Psychological functions of privacy
Journal of Environmental Psychology
(1997)- et al.
Group processes in computer-mediated communication
Organizational & Human Decision Processes
(1986) - et al.
Group process in face-to-face and computer mediated communication
Behaviour and Information Technology
(1991) The nature of prejudice
(1954)- et al.
Culture and environment
(1980)
The environment and social behavior
Equality of participation and influence in groups: the effects of communication medium and sex composition
Computer-Supported Cooperative Work
Bystander intervention on emergencies: diffusion of responsibility
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Murder, she read
New York Magazine
A foundation for the study of group decision support systems
Management Science
Capturing complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory
Organization Science
Deindividuation, self-awareness, and disinhibition
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Deindividuation: the absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members
Effects of deindividuation variables among Halloween trick-or-treaters
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
The equalization phenomenon: status effect in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups
Human–Computer Interaction
Effects of team cohesion and identifiability on social loafing in relay swimming performance
International Journal of Sport Psychology
Some consequences of de-individuation in a group
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
Computer-mediated group work: the interaction of member sex and anonymity
Communication Research
The effectiveness of a prison and parole system
A manifesto for cyborgs: science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1908’s
Mirror, mirror… The importance of looks in everyday life
The naval ship as an urban design problem
Naval Engineers Journal
Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication
Electronic Journal of Communication
Information suppression and status persistence in group decision-making: the effects of communication media
Human Communication Research
Social loafing under fatigue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
The story of psychology
Group polarization: a critical review and meta-analysis
Journal of Personality Social Psychology
Toward a theory of automated group work: the de-individuating effects of anonymity
Small Group Research
Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: the role of self-awareness and visual anonymity
European Journal of Social Psychology
Cited by (280)
Comparisons are Odious? The neural basis of in-group and out-group social comparison among game players: An fMRI study
2024, Behavioural Brain ResearchAre we braver in cyberspace? Social media anonymity enhances moral courage
2023, Computers in Human BehaviorPublic perception of electric vehicles on Reddit and Twitter: A cross-platform analysis
2023, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesDoing good or feeling good? Justice concerns predict online shaming via deservingness and schadenfreude
2023, Computers in Human Behavior Reports
- ☆
Steiner, P. (July 5, 1993). New Yorker cartoon, p. 61.