Elsevier

Child Abuse & Neglect

Volume 31, Issue 7, July 2007, Pages 731-746
Child Abuse & Neglect

The murder of children by fathers in the context of child abuse

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.12.016Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

This study examined the backgrounds of fathers who fatally abuse their children and the contexts within which these homicides occur. The type of relationship between victim, perpetrator, and the victim's mother was a particular interest.

Methods

Data were gathered from 26 cases of fatal child abuse perpetrated by fathers derived from the wider Murder in Britain study.** Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from extensive prison case files of men serving life sentences for child murder.

Results

This was a group of undereducated, underemployed men with significant criminal histories. All except one victim had been subjected to previous violence by the offender, almost three-quarter of whom had also perpetrated violence against their intimate partners (the child's birth mother). Many men had unreasonable expectations and low tolerance levels of normal childhood behaviors, and many appeared jealous and resentful of these young children. All 26 victims were under 4 years of age. Sixty-two percent of the offenders were stepfathers and in only four cases was the perpetrator a birth father married to the birth mother. Stepfathers had more disrupted and disadvantaged backgrounds and experiences than birth fathers.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that fathers who perpetrate fatal child abuse have a propensity to use violence against children in their care and intimate partners, raising questions about the gender dynamics and generational boundaries operating in these families. The nature and type of intimate relationship (whether married or cohabiting) and fathering relationship (whether birth or de facto) were important differentiating factors in these homicides as well as characteristics of the offender.

Practice implications

Professionals working in child protection strive to provide effective services to children and families, ever vigilant to the possibility of the death of a child as a consequence of an assault. By and large, fathers (either biological or de facro) as the perpetrators of such assaults have received minimal attention in both policy and practice. Findings from this study suggest that practitioners need to be cognisant of men's attitudes towards and excpeectations of fathering (particularly stepfathering) which may present increased levels of risk to both children and intimate partners.

Introduction

It is widely recognized that homicide is a male activity (Brookman & Macguire, 2003; Daly & Wilson, 1988; Mouzos, 2000, Soothill, 1999). With regard to fatal child abuse, several studies have reported a preponderance of fathers as perpetrators (Copeland, 1985, Goetting, 1988; Marks & Kumar, 1996; Somander & Rammer, 1991). Other studies have noted the prevalence of de facto fathers as perpetrators (Kaplun & Reich, 1976; Scott, 1973; Vanamo, Kauppi, Karkola, Merikanto, & Rasanen, 2001). Relatedly, a number of commentators have noted the lack of empirical data on these fathers (Adinkrah, 2003; Alder & Polk, 1996; Lucas et al., 2002) and the dominant focus on offending mothers (Corby, 2000, Victoria Child Death Review Committee, 2004). Addressing this imbalance, this paper presents findings from a study of 26 cases of fatal child abuse perpetrated by fathers (biological and de facto) convicted of the murder of their birth or stepchild. Quantitative data demonstrating patterns evident in these cases are presented, complemented with qualitative data illustrating contextual themes. The findings reported here are derived from the Murder in Britain study whose aim was to provide detailed evidence about the nature, context, situations, and lethal intentions associated with different types of murder.

Section snippets

Background

Existing research indicates that children are most likely to be killed within the family and usually by a parent or stepparent (Alder & Polk, 2001; NSPCC, 2001, Wilczynski, 1997). Several studies have identified fatal child abuse as a distinct type of familial child homicide and the one that occurs most frequently (Blaser, 1985; Christoffel & Lui, 1983; Crittenden & Craig, 1990; Herman-Giddens, 1999, Strang, 1993). In the rich body of literature on fatal child abuse, generally accepted as the

Methods

The Murder in Britain study was a 3-year investigation of all types of murder. The purpose was to conduct an intensive study of murder in order to provide detailed information regarding a range of theoretically derived constellations of factors linked to lethal violence. These included the nature of the relationship between victim and offender, childhood and adult backgrounds, criminal careers, and the nature and contexts of lethal acts. All the necessary ethical approvals were secured from the

Results

The 26 child victims were between 3 weeks and 4 years old (mean of 16 months). There were no second child victims or adult victims. Half of the victims were girls. All except one of the murder incidents occurred in the home of the victim and perpetrator. There were coaccuseds in three cases and eye-witnesses in two, all of whom were the birth mothers of the victim and intimate partner of the perpetrator. At the time of the murder, the perpetrators were aged 21–32 (mean of 25 years).

Discussion

Key findings from this study suggest a number of risk factors that are both distinct and interrelated. The majority of men (62%) were not the biological father of the victim, and the great majority were cohabiting with (81%) rather than married to (15%) the birth mother. These findings highlight the importance of relationships, both between the perpetrator and the child and between the perpetrator and his intimate partner. Other findings point to the importance of individual experiences of

Conclusion

The majority of offenders in this study were stepfathers cohabiting with birth mothers; the nature of the intimate relationship between the perpetrator and the child's birth mother (whether married or cohabiting), between the offender and the victim (whether birth or stepfather) were important differentiating factors in these homicides. Many offenders had an established propensity to use violence against children in their care and intimate partners, raising questions about the gender dynamics

Acknowledgments

Thanks are extended to colleagues in the University of Sydney for offering such a stimulating working environment. We are also appreciative of the valuable comments received from the editor and reviewers.

References (77)

  • P. Rumm et al.

    Identified spouse abuse as a risk factor for child abuse

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (2000)
  • R. Sanders et al.

    Child abuse fatalities and cases of extreme concern: Lessons from reviews

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (1999)
  • P. Schloesser et al.

    Active surveillance of child abuse fatalities

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (1992)
  • L. Somander et al.

    Intra and extra familial child homicide in Sweden 1971–1980

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (1991)
  • N. Trocme et al.

    What can child homicide rates tell us about the effectiveness of child welfare services?

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (1996)
  • T. Vanamo et al.

    Intra-familial child homicide in Finland 1970–1994: Incidence, causes of death and demographic characteristics

    Forensic Science International

    (2001)
  • C. Alder et al.

    Masculinity and child homicide

    British Journal of Criminology

    (1996)
  • C. Alder et al.

    Child victims of homicide

    (2001)
  • A. Ashworth et al.

    Rethinking English homicide law

    (2000)
  • C. Bagley et al.

    Understanding and preventing child sexual abuse

    (1996)
  • M. Blaser

    Epidemiologic characteristics of child homicides in Atlanta 1970–1980

    Pediatrician

    (1985)
  • Brookman, F., & Macguire, M. (2003). Reducing homicide: A review of the possibilities. Occasional Paper 84. London:...
  • K. Browne et al.

    The nature and extent of homicide and fatal abuse

    Child Abuse Review

    (1995)
  • D. Brownridge et al.

    Understanding male partner violence against cohabiting and married women: An empirical investigation with a synthesized model

    Journal of Family Violence

    (2002)
  • J. Campion et al.

    A study of filicidal men

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (1988)
  • K. Cavanagh et al.

    Men who murder children inside and outside the family

    British Journal of Social Work

    (2005)
  • K. Christoffel et al.

    Homicide in childhood in 23 developed countries: US rates atypically high

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (1983)
  • D. Cicchetti et al.

    Abused children-abusive parents: An overstated case

    Harvard Educational Review

    (1980)
  • A. Copeland

    Homicide in childhood

    The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology

    (1985)
  • B. Corby

    Child abuse: Towards a knowledge base

    (2000)
  • J. Cotton

    Homicide

  • S. Creighton

    Fatal child abuse—How preventable is it?

    Child Abuse Review

    (1995)
  • P. Crittenden et al.

    Developmental trends in the nature of child homicide

    Journal of Interpersonal Violence

    (1990)
  • M. Daly et al.

    Homicide

    (1988)
  • S. De Silva et al.

    Child homicide—The extreme of child abuse

    Medical Journal of Australia

    (1993)
  • R.E. Dobash et al.

    Not an ordinary killer—Just an ordinary guy. When men murder an intimate woman partner

    Violence Against Women

    (2004)
  • R.E. Dobash et al.

    Lethal and non-lethal violence against women in intimate relationships

    Violence Against Women

    (2007)
  • H. Donnelly et al.

    Sentenced homicides in New South Wales

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    Data analysis and first draft of this paper were completed when the first author was Visiting Scholar at the School of Social Work and Policy Studies at the University of Sydney, Australia. Thanks are extended to: the University of Stirling for granting sabbatical leave; colleagues in the University of Sydney for providing such a stimulating environment; and the Carnegie Foundation, Scotland for giving financial support towards this endeavour. We are also appreciative of the valuable comments received from the editor and reviewers.

    **

    The Murder in Britain study was supported by an ESRC grant.

    View full text