Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T09:07:44.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Military Medical Ethics

A Review of the Literature and a Call to Arms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2012

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Bioethics and Defense
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Beam, TE, Spracino, LR, eds. Military Medical Ethics. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General; 2003.Google Scholar

2. Visser, SL.The soldier and autonomy. In: Beam, TE, Spracino, LR, eds. Military Medical Ethics. Vol. 1. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General; 2003:251–66.Google Scholar

3. US Army Medical Department, US MD Hospital, Fort Worth Texas; available at http://www.usmdfortworth.com/patient-information/patient-rights/ (last accessed 24 Aug 2012).

4. Secretary of the Navy. Unreasonable refusal of medical, dental, or surgical treatment. In: Navy Disability Evaluation Manual, instruction 1850.4E, paragraph 3413; 2002:3–28.

5. Howe, E.Mixed agency in military medicine: Ethical roles in conflict. In: Beam, TE, Spracino, LR, eds. Military Medical Ethics. Vol. 1. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General; 2003:331–60Google Scholar; Gibson, TM, Coker, WJ.Medical confidentiality: The right of a commanding officer to know. Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps 2002;148:130–6.Google Scholar

6. Medical Management of Biological Casualties Handbook. Frederick, MD: U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases; 2004Google Scholar, at L1.

7. Brown, M.Military warfare agent human subjects testing: Part 1—history of six decades of military experiments with chemical warfare agents. Military Medicine 2009;174(10):1041–8Google Scholar. Brown, M.Military warfare agent human subjects testing: Part 2—long-term health effects among participants of U.S. military chemical warfare agent testing. Military Medicine 2009;174(10):1049–54Google Scholar. Moreno, J.Undue Risk: Secret State Experiments on Humans. New York: Routledge; 2001Google Scholar; Schmidt, U.Cold war at Porton Down. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2006;14(4):366–80Google Scholar; Lederer, SE.The cold war and beyond: Covert and deceptive American medical experimentation. In: Beam, TE, Spracino, LR, eds. Military Medical Ethics. Vol. 2. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General; 2003:507–31.Google Scholar

8. Mehlmen, MJ, Berg, JW, Juengst, ET, Kodish, E.Ethical and legal issues in enhancement research on human subjects. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2011;20:3045Google Scholar. Amoroso, PJ, Wenger, LL.The human volunteer in military research. In: Beam, TE, Spracino, LR, eds. Military Medical Ethics. Vol. 2. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General; 2003:563660Google Scholar; McManus, JG, McClinton, A, Morgan, M.Ethical issues in conduct of research in combat and disaster operations. American Journal of Disaster Medicine 2009;4(2):8793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

9. Melman Y. Medical panel: Anthrax experiments on IDF soldiers were unjustified. Haaretz 2009 Mar 23; available at http://www.haaretz.com/news/medical-panel-anthrax-experimentson-idf-soldiers-were-unjustified-1.272877; Physicians for Human Rights, Israel. Experimental anthrax vaccine administered to IDF soldiers; available at http://www.phr.org.il/default.asp?PageID=122&ItemID=709 (last accessed 24 Aug 2012).

10. Pica-Branco, D, Hudak, RP.U.S. military service members’ perceptions of the anthrax vaccine immunization program. Military Medicine 2008;173(5):429–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

11. Spence DL. Ensuring respect for persons when recruiting junior enlisted personnel for research. Military Medicine 2007;172(3):250–3.

12. McManus, J, Mehta, SG, McClinton, AR, De Lorenzo, RA, Baskin, TW.Informed consent and ethical issues in the military medical research. Academic Emergency Medicine 2005;12(11):1120–6, at 1124.Google Scholar

13. Katz, RD.Friendly fire: The mandatory military anthrax vaccination program. Duke Law Journal 2000–1;50:1835–65Google Scholar; Cummings, ML.Informed consent and investigational new drug abuses in the U.S. military. Accountability in Research 2002;9:93103Google Scholar; FitzPatrick, WJ, Zwangziger, LL.Defending against biological warfare: Ethical issues involving the coercive use of investigational drugs and biologics in the military. Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 2003;3:116Google Scholar; Miller, RK.Informed consent in the military: Fighting a losing battle against the anthrax vaccine. American Journal of Law and Medicine 2002;20(2,3):325–45Google Scholar; Pica-Branca, D, Hudak, RP.US Military service members’ perceptions of the anthrax vaccine immunization program. Military Medicine 2008;173(5):429533Google Scholar. For the UK, see Gibson, TM.A shot in the arm for the military: Consent to immunization against biological warfare agents. Medical Law International 2002;5:161–79.Google Scholar

14. Wolfendale, J, Clarke, S.Paternalism, consent, and the use of experimental drugs in the military. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2008;33(4):337–55.Google Scholar

15. Gross, ML.Bioethics and Armed Conflict: Moral Dilemmas of Medicine and War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006, at 108112.Google Scholar

16. Beam, TE.Medical ethics on the battlefield, the crucible of military medical ethics. In: Beam, TE, Spracino, LR, eds. Military Medical Ethics. Vol. 2. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General; 2003:369402Google Scholar; Adams, MP.Triage priorities and military physicians. In: Allhoff, F, ed. Physicians at War: The Dual-Loyalties Challenge. New York: Springer; 2008:215–36.Google Scholar

17. Gawande, A.Casualties of war—military care for the wounded from Iraq and Afghanistan. New England Journal of Medicine 2004;351(24):2471–5Google Scholar. Nessen, S, Lounsbury, DE, Hetz, SP.War Surgery in Afghanistan and Iraq, a Series of Cases, 2003–2007. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army;2008, at 36.Google Scholar

18. See note 17, Nessen 2008, 4, 66, 108, 211, 223, 297, 365–72, 385–8, 399–401.

19. Gross, ML.The limits of impartial medical treatment during armed conflict. In: Gross, ML, Carrick, D, eds. Military Medical Ethics for the 21st Century. Farnham: Ashgate; 2013.Google Scholar

20. Sokol, DK.The medical ethics of the battlefield. British Medical Journal 2011;343:d3877CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Paix, B.Member care versus humanitarian aid: Using the Iraq conflict to examine the role of military medicine in war. ADF Health 2006;8:24–7.Google Scholar

21. Sessums, LL, Collen, JF, O’Malley, PG, Jacobson, JL, Roy, MJ.Ethical practice under fire: Deployed physicians in the global war on terrorism. Military Medicine 2009;174(5):441–7Google Scholar; Baer, HU, Baillat, JM.Military necessity versus the protection of the wounded and sick: A critical balance. Military Medicine 2002;167 Suppl:17–9Google Scholar; Xenakis, SN, Ofran, Y.Maintaining medical neutrality in conflict zones. Virtual Mentor 2007;9(10):681–7.Google Scholar

22. Howe, E.Dilemmas in military medical ethics since 9/11. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2003;13(2):175–88.Google Scholar

23. Gross, M.Teaching military medical ethics: Another look at dual-loyalty and triage. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2010;19:458–63Google Scholar. See also Carter, BS.Ethical concerns for physicians deployed to operation Desert Storm. Military Medicine 1994;159(1):55–9.Google Scholar

24. Repine, TB, Lisagor, P, Cohen, DJ.The dynamics and ethics of triage: Rationing care in hard times. Military Medicine 2005;170(6):505–9, at 507.Google Scholar

25. Enemark, C.The ethical challenges for US military medicine in Iraq. Journal of Medical Ethics 2008;7(3):186201.Google Scholar

26. Cole, L.Ethics and terror medicine. In: Shapira, S, Hammond, J, Cole, L. Essentials of Terror Medicine. Springer; 2009:425–39.Google Scholar

27. Gesundheit, B, Ash, N, Blazer, S, Rivkind, AI. Medical care for terrorists—to treat or not to treat? American Journal of Bioethics 2009;9(10):40–2.Google Scholar

28. See note 22, Howe 2003.

29. See note 23, Gross 2010; Kemp, KR. Ethics training for military medical trainees: The Brooke Army Medical Center experience. Military Medicine 2008;173(10):968–74.Google Scholar

30. See note 23, Gross 2010, at 198–210. Wilensky, RJ.Military Medicine to Win Hearts and Minds: Aid to Civilians in the Vietnam War. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press; 2004.Google Scholar

31. Zajtchuk, JT.Military medicine in humanitarian missions. In: Beam, TE, Spracino, LR, eds. Military Medical Ethics. Vol. 2. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General; 2003:773804Google Scholar; Ritchie, EC, Mott, RL.Military humanitarian assistance: The pitfalls and promise of good intentions. In: Beam, TE, Spracino, LR, eds. Military Medical Ethics. Vol. 2. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General; 2003:805–30.Google Scholar

32. Keenan, S.Role of medicine in supporting special forces counter-insurgency operations in Southern Afghanistan. Journal of Special Operations Medicine 2007;7(1):4850, at 48.Google Scholar

33. Lesho, EP, Jawad, NK, Hameed, HM.Towards a better approach to medical humanitarian assistance in Iraq and future counterinsurgency operations. Military Medicine 2011;176(1):13Google Scholar. Malish, R, Scott, JS, Rasheed, BO.Military-civic action: Lessons learned from a brigage-level aid project in the 2003 war with Iraq. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 2006;21(3):135–8Google Scholar. Burkle, FM.Military-civic action and the 4th Geneva Convention: Lessons learned or ignored? Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 2006;21(3):129–40Google Scholar. Pueschel, M.US special forces medics in Afghanistan look to partner with NGOs in rural health. Journal of Special Operations Medicine 2010;10(3):59Google Scholar. Alderman, S, Christensen, J, Crawford, I.Medical seminars: A new paradigm for special operations forces counterinsurgency medical programs. Journal of Special Operations Medicine 2010;10(1):1622, at 21.Google Scholar

34. Arya, N.Peace through health? In: Webel, C, Galtung, J, eds. Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies. Routledge: New York; 2007:367–94Google Scholar; Bortolotti, RD.Hope in Hell: Inside the World of Doctors without Borders. Buffalo, NY: Firefly; 2010.Google Scholar

35. Zwi AB, Bunde-Birouste A, Grove N, Waller E, Ritchie J. The Health and Peace Building Filter, Companion Manual. 2006, at iv.

36. Schwartz, L. Ethics in humanitarian aid work: Learning from the narratives of humanitarian health workers. American Journal of Bioethics, Primary Research 2010;1(3):4554Google Scholar; Buhmann, C, Santa Barbara, J, Arya, N, Melf, K.The roles of the health care sector and health workers before, during and after armed violent conflict. Medicine Conflict and Survival 2010;26(1):423.Google Scholar

37. Drifmeyer, J, Llewellyn, C.Toward more effective humanitarian assistance. Military Medicine 2004;169:161–8, at 166.Google Scholar

38. See note 35, Zwi et al. 2006. Chase, R, Arya, N.Epidemiology as a tool for interdisciplinary peace and health studies. In: Arya, N, Santa Barbara, J. Peace Through Health: How Health Professionals Can Work for a Less Violent World. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press; 2008:161–72.Google Scholar

39. Arya, N.Secondary prevention: Humanitarian ceasefires. In: Arya, N, Santa Barbara, J. Peace Through Health: How Health Professionals Can Work for a Less Violent World. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press; 2008:193–6.Google Scholar

40. Zwi, AB. Placing ethics in the centre: Negotiating new spaces for ethical research in conflict situations. Global Public Health 2006;1(3):264–77Google Scholar, at 264. Banatvala, N, Zwi, AB.Public health and humanitarian interventions: Developing the evidence base. British Medical Journal 2000;321:103Google Scholar; Grove, NJ, Zwi, AB.Beyond the log frame: A new tool for examining health and peacebuilding. Development in Practice 2008;18(1):6681.Google Scholar

41. Graeme MacQueen, G, Santa Barbara, J.Peace building through health initiatives. British Medical Journal 2000;321:293–7Google Scholar. See also note 36, Buhmann et al. 2010, at 17. Santa Barbara, J.Evaluation of peace through health initiatives. In: Arya, N, Santa Barbara, J. Peace Through Health: How Health Professionals Can Work for a Less Violent World. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press; 2008: 247–258.Google Scholar

42. Vass, A.Peace through health. British Medical Journal 2001;323:1020Google Scholar; Jabbour S. Healing and peace making in the Middle East: Challenges for doctors. Lancet 2005 Jan 25; available at http://image.thelancet.com/extras/04cmt309web.pdf (last accessed 23 Aug 2012).

43. Moreno J. Mind wars: Brain research and national defense. Dana Press; 2006:114–38; Saniotis, A.Present and future developments in cognitive enhancement technologies. Journal of Future Studies 2009;14(1):2738Google Scholar; Wang, T.Towards a military medical ethics framework for genetic human enhancement. Penn Bioethics Journal 2010;6(1):812.Google Scholar

44. Russo, MB, Arnett, MV, Thomas, ML, Caldwell, JA.Ethical use of cogniceuticals in the militaries of democratic nations. American Journal of Bioethics 2008;8(2):3941.Google Scholar

45. Annas, CL, Annas, GJ.Enhancing the fighting force. Journal of Contemporary Health and Policy 2009;25:283308Google Scholar; Schermer, M, Bolt, I, de Jongh, R, Olivier, B.The future of psychopharmacological enhancements: Expectations and policies. Neuroethics 2009;2:7587CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gibson, TM.The bioethics of enhancing human performance for spaceflight. Journal of Medical Ethics 2006;32:129–32.Google Scholar

46. Henry, M, Fishman, JR, Youngner, SJ.Propranolol and the prevention of post-traumatic stress disorder: Is it wrong to erase the “sting” of bad memories? American Journal of Bioethics 2007;7(9):1220Google Scholar. Wolfendale, J.Performance-enhancing technologies and moral responsibility in the military. American Journal of Bioethics 2008;8(2):2838.Google Scholar

47. Caldwell, JA.Go pills in combat: Prejudice, propriety and practicality. Air & Space Power Journal 2008;97104Google Scholar. Ashcroft, RE.Regulating biomedical enhancements in the military. American Journal of Bioethics 2008;8(2):47–8.Google Scholar

48. Selgelid, MJ.Governance of dual-use research: An ethical dilemma. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2009;87:720–3.Google Scholar

49. Atlas, RM, Dando, M.The dual-use dilemma for the life sciences: Perspectives, conundrums and global solutions. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice and Science 2006;4(3):276–86.Google Scholar

50. U.S. National Research Council. Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004Google Scholar; Green, SK, Taub, S, Morin, K, Higginson, D, Council for the Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association. Position paper: Guidelines to prevent the malevolent use of biomedical research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2006;15:432–9.Google Scholar

51. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity. Proposed Framework for the Oversight of Dual-Use Life Sciences Research: Strategies for Minimizing the Potential Misuse of Research Information; 2007 June; available at http://oba.od.nih.gov/biosecurity/pdf/Framework%20for%20transmittal%200807_Sept07.pdf (last accessed 23 Aug 2012).

52. Miller, S, Selgelid, MJ.Ethical and philosophical consideration of the dual-use dilemma in the biological sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics 2007;13:523–80Google Scholar. See also Selgelid, MJ.A tale of two studies: Ethics, bioterrorism and the censorship of science. Hastings Center Report 2007;37(3):3543Google Scholar; Harris, ED.Controlling Dangerous Pathogens: A Proposed International Biosecurity Oversight System, Uganda National Academy of Sciences, Promoting Biosafety and Biosecurity Within the Life Sciences: An International Workshop for East Africa. Kampala, Uganda: UNAS Press; 2008Google Scholar; See note 43, Moreno 2006, at 162–84; Schubert, C.Bioterror experts split on recommendations for “dual-use” research. Nature Medicine 2008;14(9):893.Google Scholar

53. For recent studies, see Davison N. Nonlethal Weapons. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009; Koplow, D.Nonlethal Weapons: The Law and Policy of Revolutionary Technologies for the Military and Law Enforcement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006Google Scholar; National Research Council. An Assessment of Nonlethal Weapons Science and Technology, Committee for an Assessment of Nonlethal Weapons Science and Technology Naval Studies Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003; National Research Council. Opportunities in Neuroscience for Future Army Applications. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009Google Scholar; National Research Council. Emerging Cognitive Neuroscience and Related Technologies. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2008Google Scholar; Davison, N, Lewer, N.Bradford Nonlethal Weapons Research Project, (BNLWRP), Research Report No. 8. Bradford, UK: University of Bradford, Centre for Conflict Resolution, Department of Peace Studies; 2006 MarGoogle Scholar. See note 43, Moreno 2006; Sutherland, RG.Chemical and Biochemical Nonlethal Weapons Political and Technical Aspects SIPRI Policy Paper No. 23. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute; 2008Google Scholar; Alexander, JP.An overview of the future of nonlethal weapons. Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2001;17:180–93.Google Scholar

54. Wolpe, PR, Foster, KR, Daniel, D.Emerging neurotechnologies for lie detection: Promise or peril. American Journal of Bioethics 2005;5(2):3949Google Scholar. See also Marks, J.A neuroskeptic’s guide to neurethics and national security. American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2010;1(2):412Google Scholar. Langleben, DL.Detection of deception with fMRI: Are we there yet? Legal and Criminological Psychology 2008;13(1):19Google Scholar. Langleben dismisses charges that fMRI can read minds: “Deception is not a thought,” he writes, “but a voluntary act. . . . Lie detection demands that there is a lie, i.e. a conscious and voluntary response to a query” (p. 5).

55. Fidler, DP.The meaning of Moscow: “Nonlethal” weapons and international law in the early 21st century. International Review of the Red Cross 2005;87:525–52.Google Scholar

56. Pearson, A.Incapacitating biochemical weapons: Science, technology, and policy for the 21st century. Nonproliferation Review 2006;13(2):151–88.Google Scholar

57. BMA Board of Science. The Use of Drugs as Weapons the Concerns and Responsibilities of Healthcare Professionals. London: Science & Education Department British Medical Association; 2007Google Scholar; Nathanson, V.The case against doctor involvement in weapons design and development. In: Allhoff, F, ed. Physicians at War: The Dual-Loyalties Challenge. Springer; 2008:167–77Google Scholar; Dando, M.Biologists napping while work militarized. Nature 2009;460:950–1.Google Scholar

58. See note 15, Gross 2006, 282–5.

59. Frisina, ME.Medical ethics in military biomedical research. In: Beam, TE, Spracino, LR, eds. Military Medical Ethics. Vol. 2. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General; 2003:533–61Google Scholar; Leitenberg, M, Leonard, J, Spertzel, R.Biodefense crossing the line. Politics Life Science 2003;22(2):23Google Scholar; Ozonoff, D.The case against plans for a biodefense research laboratory. In Levy, BS, Sidel, V. War and Public Health. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:139–40.Google Scholar

60. Rosenberg, L, Gehrie, E.Against the use of medical technologies for military or national security interests. American Journal of Bioethics 2007;7(5):22–4.Google Scholar

61. Gross, M.Medicalized weapons and modern war. Hastings Center Report 2010;40(1):3443Google Scholar; and Gross, M.Is medicine a pacifist vocation or should physicians help build bombs? In: Allhoff, F, ed. Physicians at War: The Dual-Loyalties Challenge. Springer; 2008:151–66.Google Scholar

62. Miles, SH.Oath Betrayed, Torture, Medical Complicity, and the War on Terror. New York: Random House; 2006Google Scholar; Bloche, MG, Marks, JH.Doctors and interrogators at Guantanamo Bay. New England Journal of Medicine 2005;353(1):68Google Scholar; Bloche, MG, Marks, JH.When doctors go to war. New England Journal of Medicine 2005;352(1):36Google Scholar. Marks, JH.Doctors of interrogation. Hastings Center Report 2005;35(4):1722.Google Scholar

63. Physicians for Human Rights. Experiments in Torture: Evidence of Human Subject Research and Experimentation in the “Enhanced” Interrogation Program. Cambridge, MA: Physicians for Human Rights; 2010.Google Scholar

64. American Medical Association, Code of Medical Ethics. Opinion 2.068—Physician Participation in Interrogation; 2006; available at http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion2068.shtml; World Medical Association. Declaration of Tokyo—Guidelines for Physicians Concerning Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in Relation to Detention and Imprisonment; 2006; available at http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/c18/index.html. For a review, see Bahnassi A. Keeping doctors out of the interrogation room: A new ethical obligation that requires the backing of the law. Health Matrix 2009; available at http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Keeping+doctors+out+of+the+interrogation+room%3A+a+new+ethical...-a0212410473 (last accessed 23 Aug 2012).

65. Annas, G.Worst Case Bioethics: Death, Disaster and Public Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010, at 52.Google Scholar

66. Marks, JH, Bloche, MG.The ethics of interrogation—the US military’s ongoing use of psychiatrists. New England Journal of Medicine 2008;359(11):1090–2.Google Scholar

67. Miles S. Torture: The bioethics perspective. In: From Birth to Death and Bench to Clinic: The Hastings Center Bioethics Briefing Book for Journalists, Policymakers, and Campaigns; available at http://www.thehastingscenter.org/Publications/BriefingBook/Default.aspx (last accessed 23 Aug 2012).

68. CIA director Michael Hayden says coercive and harsh interrogations techniques worked. Cleveland Plain Dealer 2009 Jan 15. This number reflects sanctioned and approved instances of enhanced interrogation. It does not reflect reports of prisoner abuse that run into the hundreds. Although some observers argue that enhanced interrogation may lead to prisoner abuse, these are two distinct legal and moral issues. The torture debate focuses on the ethics of sanctioned interrogation under special circumstances. Prisoner abuse, on the other hand, is a criminal offense that U.S. authorities investigate and prosecute. (See, for example, Human Rights Watch, Center for Human Rights and Global Justice. By the Numbers: Findings of the Detainee Abuse and Accountability Project; 2006; available at http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2006/04/25/numbers (last accessed 23 Aug 2012).

69. Dershowitz, AM.Why Terrorism Works: Understanding the Threat and Responding to the Challenge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2002Google Scholar. Posner, RA.Not a Suicide Pact: The Constitution in Time of National Emergency. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006Google Scholar. Posner, RA.Torture, terrorism, and interrogation. In: Levinson, S, ed. Torture: A Collection. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004:291–8Google Scholar; Allhoff, F. Terrorism, Ticking Time-Bombs and Torture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; forthcoming.Google Scholar

70. See note 15, Gross 2006, 211–44.

71. Koch, T.Weaponising medicine: Tutti fratelli, no more. Journal of Medical Ethics 2006;32:249–52Google Scholar. Allhoff, A.Physician involvement in hostile interrogations. In: Allhoff, F, ed. Physicians at War: The Dual-Loyalties Challenge. Springer; 2008:91104.Google Scholar

72. Howe, EG, Kosaraju, A, Laraby, PR, Casscells, SW.Guantanamo: Ethics, interrogation, and forced feeding. Military Medicine 2009;174(1):viii.Google Scholar

73. Lepora, C, Millum, J.The tortured patient: A medical dilemma. Hastings Center Report 2011;41(3):3847, at 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

74. See note 64, WMA 2006.

75. For an overview, see Howe, E.Further considerations regarding interrogations and forced feeding. In Goodman, R, Roseman, M. Interrogations, Forced Feedings, and the Role of Health Professionals: New Perspectives on International Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, and Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2009:75102.Google Scholar

76. See note 72, Howe et al. 2009; see also Okie, S.Glimpses of Guantanamo—medical ethics and the War on Terror. New England Journal of Medicine 2005;353(24):2529–34Google Scholar, at xi; Sherman, N.Holding doctors responsible at Guantanamo. Kennedy Institute for Ethics Journal 2006;16(2):199203Google Scholar. Glick, S.Unlimited human autonomy—a cultural bias? New England Journal of Medicine 1997;336:954–6.Google Scholar

77. WMA Declaration of Malta on Hunger Strikers; 1991 (2006 revised), para. 21. World Medical Association. Declaration of Malta: A background paper on the ethical management of hunger strikers. World Medical Journal 2006;52(2):3643Google Scholar. See also note 65, Annas 2010, 59–74; Annas, G.Hunger strikers at Guantanamo—medical ethics and human rights in a “legal black hole.” New England Journal of Medicine 2006;355:1377–82Google Scholar; Allen, SA, Reyes, H.Clinical and operational issues in the medical management of hunger strikers. In: Goodman, R, Roseman, M. Interrogations, Forced Feedings, and the Role of Health Professionals: New Perspectives on International Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, and Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2009:189203Google Scholar. Welsh, J.Responding to food refusal: Striking the human rights balance. In: Goodman, R, Roseman, M. Interrogations, Forced Feedings, and the Role of Health Professionals: New Perspectives on International Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, and Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2009:143–72Google Scholar. Rubinstein, L, Annas, G.Medical ethics at Guantanamo Bay detention centre and in the US military: A time for reform. Lancet 2009;374:353–5Google Scholar. Crosby, SS, Apovian, CM, Grodin, MA.Hunger strikes, force-feeding, and physicians’ responsibilities. JAMA 2007;298:563–6Google Scholar. Zupan, D, Solis, G, Schoonhoven, R.Commentary: Dialysis for a prisoner of war. Hastings Center Report 2004;34:11–2.Google Scholar

78. See note 57, BMA 2007, 21. See also Allhoff, F.Physicians at war: The dual loyalties challenge. In: Allhoff, F, ed. Physicians at War: The Dual-Loyalties Challenge. Springer; 2008:314.Google Scholar

79. Case study provided by the IDF Medical Corps, personnel communication, 27 May 2010. For placebo guidelines, see Jonsen, A, Siegler, M, Winslade, W.Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine. 7th ed.McGraw-Hill; 2010Google Scholar: section 2.1.8.

80. See note 5, Howe 2003.

81. Annas, GJ.Case study: Dialysis for a prisoner of war. Hastings Center Report 2004;34(6):12Google Scholar. See also Annas, GJ.Military medical ethics—physician first, last, always. New England Journal of Medicine 2008;359(11):1087–90Google Scholar; International Dual-Loyalty Working Group. Dual loyalty and human rights in health professional practice. In: Allhoff, F, ed. Physicians at War: The Dual-Loyalties Challenge. Springer; 2008:1538Google Scholar; and note 21, Sessums et al. 2009.

82. Sidel, VW, Levy, BS.Physician-soldier: A moral dilemma. In: Beam, TE, Spracino, LR, eds. Military Medical Ethics. Vol. 1. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General; 2003:293330.Google Scholar

83. See note 15, Gross 2006, 27–64.

84. Madden, W, Carter, BS.Physician-soldier—A moral profession. In: Beam, TE, Spracino, LR, eds. Military Medical Ethics. Vol. 1. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General; 2003:269–91.Google Scholar

85. Howe, EG.Mixed agency in military medicine: Ethical roles in conflict. In: Beam, TE, Spracino, LR, eds. Military Medical Ethics. Vol. 1. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General; 2003:331–65Google Scholar; Warner, CH, et al. . Ethical considerations in military psychiatry. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 2009;32:271–81.Google Scholar

86. Howe, EG.Point/counterpoint—a response to Drs. Sidel and Levy. In: Beam, TE, Spracino, LR, eds. Military Medical Ethics. Vol. 1. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General; 2003:312–20.Google Scholar

87. Beam, TE, Howe, EG.A proposed ethic for military medicine. In: Beam, TE, Spracino, LR, eds. Military Medical Ethics. Vol. 1. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General; 2003:851–65.Google Scholar

88. See note 62, Marks 2005.

89. Benatar, SR, Upshur, REG.Dual loyalty of physicians in the military and in civilian life. American Journal of Public Health 2008;98(12):2161–7.Google Scholar

90. Selgelid, M.Governance of dual-use research: An ethical dilemma. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2009;87:720–3, at 722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

91. Savulescu, J, Bostrom, N, eds. Human Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.Google Scholar

92. Canli, T. Neuroethics and national security. American Journal of Bioethics 2007;7(5):313, at 10.Google Scholar

93. See note 92, Canli et al. 2007.

94. See Gross, ML, Carrick, D, eds. Military Medical Ethics for the 21st Century. Farnham: Ashgate; 2013.Google Scholar