NEW RESEARCH
Sex and Race Differences in Mental Health Symptoms in Juvenile Justice: The MAYSI-2 National Meta-Analysis

https://doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e318160d516Get rights and content

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Studies have suggested a high prevalence of mental health symptoms among youths in the juvenile justice system, with the highest prevalence among girls and whites compared to boys and other races. This multisite, archival study examined whether sex and race differences, when they exist, were consistent across U.S. juvenile justice programs.

Method:

Data included scores on the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-Version 2 (MAYSI-2) for 70,423 youths from 283 juvenile justice probation, detention, or corrections programs. A meta-analytic technique investigated the consistency of effect sizes for sex and race/ethnic differences across sites in self-reported mental health problems.

Results:

Across sites, girls on average were 1.8 (95% confidence interval 0.98-1.10) to 2.4 (95% confidence interval 2.38-2.48) times as likely as boys to have clinical elevations on all applicable MAYSI-2 scales except the Alcohol/Drug Use scale. On the Alcohol/Drug Use scale, a sex effect existed but only among younger youths. Whites were more likely to have clinical elevations than blacks or Hispanics; but surprisingly disparities varied across mental health categories and varied considerably across sites.

Conclusion:

At the aggregate level, 72% of girls and 63% of boys had a clinical elevation on at least one MAYSI-2 scale. Our meta-analytic technique indicated that the sex differences across sites were even larger than these numbers imply. Conversely and counter to existing evidence, race-related differences were generally small or nonexistent. Whites were more likely to have alcohol and drug problems and suicide ideation, but not more likely to have symptoms of depression, anxiety, or thought disturbance than blacks or Hispanics.

Section snippets

ArticlePlus

Click on the links below to access all the ArticlePlus for this article.

Please note that ArticlePlus files may launch a viewer application outside of your web browser.

Recent studies using various forms of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC) suggest that about two thirds of youths involved with the juvenile justice system meet criteria for one or more psychiatric disorders, even after excluding conduct disorder.1, 2, 3, 4,

Sample

The sample was constructed from archival intake records consisting of data sets that were obtained from 283 sites in 19 states, including three types of juvenile justice programs: 141 intake probation offices from 7 states, 91 pretrial detention sites from 16 states, and 51 secure corrections sites from 12 states. In this report, each of the three types of programs is a gate, and each independent program is a site.

The initial data set consisted of 155,835 youths (cases). Cases were excluded

Sample Characteristics

Cases (N = 70,423) were fairly evenly distributed across gates, with 36% of the sample coming from intake probation, 42% from pretrial detention, and 22% from postadjudication correctional settings. About one fourth of the sample (22%) were girls and one third (30%) were younger youths (12-14 years). For race/ethnicity, 39% self-identified as white, 34% as black, and 24% as Hispanic (Table 1). Another 1% of cases were Asian and 3% were in the other race category, neither of which had large

DISCUSSION

This study examined the extent to which sex and race/ethnic differences in the reporting of symptoms of mental disorder among youths in juvenile justice generalized across the United States. Other studies have investigated rates of mental disorder in juvenile justice youths, but few have examined sex- and race-related differences in self-reported symptoms, and most were conducted in single facilities or states, rendering findings that could be site specific. We improved the extant literature by

REFERENCES (25)

  • P Szatmari et al.

    ADHD and CD: Degree of diagnostic overlap and differences among correlates

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (1989)
  • D Offord et al.

    Ontario Child Health Study: II. Six-month prevalence of disorder and rates of service utilization

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1987)
  • Cited by (117)

    • Justice-involved youth

      2023, Encyclopedia of Mental Health, Third Edition: Volume 1-3
    • Profiles of Risk for Self-injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Among System-Impacted Girls of Color

      2023, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    • Dual system youth: Subsequent system re-entry after receiving mental health services

      2021, Children and Youth Services Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      In more recent years, as a result, over 90% of dual system youth have received MH services (Kim et al., 2020). Reforms like the Keeping Children and Families Safe Act of 2003 could reflect efforts to address the disproportionate rates of MH disorders within the JJ system (Schubert, Mulvey, & Glasheen, 2011; Vincent, Grisso, Terry, & Banks, 2008). Multiple reform efforts in the 2000s (e.g., law enforcement diversion, intake diversion, school-based diversion, and specialty courts such as juvenile MH and drug courts) have not only focused attention on the MH problems of youth in the JJ system, but also emphasized diversion as a means to treat such youth in the community instead of relying on the JJ system (Council of Juvenile Justice Administrator [CJJA], 2017; Lipsey, Howell, Kelly, Chapman, & Carver, 2010; National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice, 2009).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Article Plus (online only) materials for this article appear on the Journal's Web site:www.jaacap.com.

    This study was funded by the William T. Grant Foundation. We thank Cristen Gabriele, M.A., and Valerie Williams, M.A., M.S., for their assistance with data management. We acknowledge the passing of our friend, colleague, and statistical genius, Dr. Steven Banks. This research is another example of his countless contributions to mental health services research. He will continue to live in our memories and our work.

    Disclosure: Some royalties received from sales of the MAYSI-2 manual go to the National Youth Screening Assistance Project and are used for research activities pertaining to the MAYSI-2. The authors report no additional conflicts of interest.

    View full text