Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
NEW RESEARCHSex and Race Differences in Mental Health Symptoms in Juvenile Justice: The MAYSI-2 National Meta-Analysis
Section snippets
ArticlePlus
Click on the links below to access all the ArticlePlus for this article.
Please note that ArticlePlus files may launch a viewer application outside of your web browser.
Recent studies using various forms of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC) suggest that about two thirds of youths involved with the juvenile justice system meet criteria for one or more psychiatric disorders, even after excluding conduct disorder.1, 2, 3, 4,
Sample
The sample was constructed from archival intake records consisting of data sets that were obtained from 283 sites in 19 states, including three types of juvenile justice programs: 141 intake probation offices from 7 states, 91 pretrial detention sites from 16 states, and 51 secure corrections sites from 12 states. In this report, each of the three types of programs is a gate, and each independent program is a site.
The initial data set consisted of 155,835 youths (cases). Cases were excluded
Sample Characteristics
Cases (N = 70,423) were fairly evenly distributed across gates, with 36% of the sample coming from intake probation, 42% from pretrial detention, and 22% from postadjudication correctional settings. About one fourth of the sample (22%) were girls and one third (30%) were younger youths (12-14 years). For race/ethnicity, 39% self-identified as white, 34% as black, and 24% as Hispanic (Table 1). Another 1% of cases were Asian and 3% were in the other race category, neither of which had large
DISCUSSION
This study examined the extent to which sex and race/ethnic differences in the reporting of symptoms of mental disorder among youths in juvenile justice generalized across the United States. Other studies have investigated rates of mental disorder in juvenile justice youths, but few have examined sex- and race-related differences in self-reported symptoms, and most were conducted in single facilities or states, rendering findings that could be site specific. We improved the extant literature by
REFERENCES (25)
- et al.
The Voice DISC-IV with incarcerated male youths: prevalence of disorder
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(2002) Isle of Wight revisited: twenty-five years of child psychiatric epidemiology
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1989)- et al.
Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument for mental health needs of juvenile justice youths
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(2001) A statewide screening of mental health symptoms among juvenile offenders in detention
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(2004)- et al.
Screening for emergent risk and service needs among incarcerated youth: comparing MAYSI-2 and Voice DISC-IV
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(2004) - et al.
Comorbid psychiatric disorders in youth detention
Arch Gen Psychiatry
(2003) - et al.
Mental health and incarcerated youth: I. Prevalence and nature of psychopathology
J Child Fam Stud
(1999) - et al.
Blueprint for Change: A Comprehensive Model for the Identification and Treatment of Youth With Mental Health Needs in Contact With the Juvenile Justice System [draft]
(2006) - et al.
Psychiatric disorders in youth and juvenile detention
Arch Gen Psychiatry
(2002) Psychotherapy for Children and Adolescents: Directions for Research and Practice
(2000)
ADHD and CD: Degree of diagnostic overlap and differences among correlates
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Ontario Child Health Study: II. Six-month prevalence of disorder and rates of service utilization
Arch Gen Psychiatry
Cited by (117)
The intersection of race, ethnicity, and gender and the prevalence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors
2023, Preventive Medicine ReportsJustice-involved youth
2023, Encyclopedia of Mental Health, Third Edition: Volume 1-3Profiles of Risk for Self-injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Among System-Impacted Girls of Color
2023, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryDual system youth: Subsequent system re-entry after receiving mental health services
2021, Children and Youth Services ReviewCitation Excerpt :In more recent years, as a result, over 90% of dual system youth have received MH services (Kim et al., 2020). Reforms like the Keeping Children and Families Safe Act of 2003 could reflect efforts to address the disproportionate rates of MH disorders within the JJ system (Schubert, Mulvey, & Glasheen, 2011; Vincent, Grisso, Terry, & Banks, 2008). Multiple reform efforts in the 2000s (e.g., law enforcement diversion, intake diversion, school-based diversion, and specialty courts such as juvenile MH and drug courts) have not only focused attention on the MH problems of youth in the JJ system, but also emphasized diversion as a means to treat such youth in the community instead of relying on the JJ system (Council of Juvenile Justice Administrator [CJJA], 2017; Lipsey, Howell, Kelly, Chapman, & Carver, 2010; National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice, 2009).
Examining Justice System Exposure Among Youth on Health in Young Adulthood: Does Dosage of Contact Matter?
2024, Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice
Article Plus (online only) materials for this article appear on the Journal's Web site:www.jaacap.com.
This study was funded by the William T. Grant Foundation. We thank Cristen Gabriele, M.A., and Valerie Williams, M.A., M.S., for their assistance with data management. We acknowledge the passing of our friend, colleague, and statistical genius, Dr. Steven Banks. This research is another example of his countless contributions to mental health services research. He will continue to live in our memories and our work.
Disclosure: Some royalties received from sales of the MAYSI-2 manual go to the National Youth Screening Assistance Project and are used for research activities pertaining to the MAYSI-2. The authors report no additional conflicts of interest.