Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
ReplyLetters

Reply

Timothy M. Houchin, John Ranseen, Phillip A. K. Hash and Daniel J. Barnicki
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2012, 40 (3) 447-448;
Timothy M. Houchin
Child and Adolescent Forensic Psychiatrist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Ranseen
Associate Professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Phillip A. K. Hash
Fellow in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Department of Psychiatry University of Kentucky Lexington, KY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel J. Barnicki
Attorney-at-Law Chicago, IL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Editor:

We would first like to thank the readers who responded to |“The Parental Alienation Debate Belongs in the Courtroom, Not in DSM-5, ” which was published in the January issue.1 We heard from many renowned clinicians on both sides of the parental alienation debate, which has now raged for nearly 30 years since Dr. Gardner first proposed it as a mental health diagnosis. We would also like to use this forum to respond briefly to some criticisms raised by Ms. Gottlieb and Dr. Pilla in their respective letters.

In her letter, Gottlieb implied that we were dismissive of evidence and research supportive of parental alienation as a psychiatric diagnosis. To the contrary, we performed a broad review of the literature on the subject. We found that, despite the vast amount of oral and written commentary on the topic, there remains a lack of statistically sound, peer-reviewed scientific research to support its inclusion in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5).2 We are arguing that quantity of writing is not equal to scientifically based research, and the DSM-5 Task Force should take this fact into consideration.

In her letter, Pilla criticized the article for its “use of confusingly inconsistent acronyms.” We agree with her that having interchangeable acronyms for the proposed disorder is confusing. However, the responsibility for this confusion does not belong to us, but to those who transformed Dr. Gardner's parental alienation syndrome into parental alienation disorder shortly before formally proposing its inclusion in the DSM-5.

We stand firm in our opinion regarding the seemingly never-ending debate on parental alienation. We agree that parents sometimes engage in inappropriate persuasion of their children (as do advertisers, educators, coaches, and others). We do not agree that the elevation of parental alienation disorder to the status of a bona fide mental illness is appropriate. In the authors' view, PAD represents both an unproven and unnecessary expansion of the DSM-5.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: None.

  • © 2012 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Houchin T,
    2. Ranseen J,
    3. Hash PAK,
    4. et al
    : The parental alienation debate belongs in the courtroom, not in DSM-5. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 40: 127– 31, 2012
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Available at www.dsm5.org
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 40 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 40, Issue 3
1 Sep 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reply
Timothy M. Houchin, John Ranseen, Phillip A. K. Hash, Daniel J. Barnicki
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2012, 40 (3) 447-448;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Reply
Timothy M. Houchin, John Ranseen, Phillip A. K. Hash, Daniel J. Barnicki
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2012, 40 (3) 447-448;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Editor:
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Letters
  • Letters
  • Letters
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2023 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law