Letters

  • Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
  • December 2012,
  • 40
  • (4)
  • 590;

Editor:

In the January issue of the Journal, the article, “The Involuntary Medication of Jared Loughner and Pretrial Detainees in Nonmedical Correctional Facilities”1 contained a misstatement on page 103. Citing Vitek v. Jones,2 I stated: “A court hearing with specified due process protection is therefore required before such a transfer can be constitutionally effected.” The Supreme Court in its Vitek opinion required minimum due process procedures, including, among others, an adversarial hearing and an independent decision-maker, but the holding did not require a court hearing.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: None.

References

  1. 1.
    FelthousAR : The involuntary medication of Jared Loughner and pretrial jail detainees in nonmedical correctional facilities. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 40: 90112, 2012
  2. 2.
    Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480 (1980).
Loading
  • Print
  • Download PDF
  • Article Alerts
  • Email Article
  • Citation Tools
  • Request Permissions
  • Share

No citing articles found.