Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Articles

I'll See You in Court…Again: Psychopathology and Hyperlitigious Litigants

C. Adam Coffey, Stanley L. Brodsky and David M. Sams
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online March 2017, 45 (1) 62-71;
C. Adam Coffey
Mr. Coffey is a Student and Dr. Brodsky is Professor Emeritus and Scholar in Residence, Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, Mr. Sams is an attorney with the Community Tax Law Project in Richmond, VA.
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stanley L. Brodsky
Mr. Coffey is a Student and Dr. Brodsky is Professor Emeritus and Scholar in Residence, Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, Mr. Sams is an attorney with the Community Tax Law Project in Richmond, VA.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Sams
Mr. Coffey is a Student and Dr. Brodsky is Professor Emeritus and Scholar in Residence, Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, Mr. Sams is an attorney with the Community Tax Law Project in Richmond, VA.
JD, LLM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Persistent litigation is a problem in many legal jurisdictions and is costly at individual and systemic levels. This phenomenon is referred to as “querulous” behavior in psychiatric literature, whereas legal discourse refers to it as “vexatious litigation.” We refer to this phenomenon as “hyperlitigious behavior” and those who engage in these actions as “hyperlitigious litigants.” Hyperlitigious litigants and hyperlitigious behavior were once the focus of a considerable amount of psychiatric literature, but research devoted to these topics has declined over the past half century. A review of the published literature on hyperlitigious behavior in European and English-speaking countries highlights geographic differences in the conceptualization and management of this behavior. We provide an alternative framework to consider the motivation to engage in hyperlitigious behavior and suggest three strategies for mental health professionals who interact with these individuals. Finally, we call for a revival of discussions and research within the English-speaking psychiatric community to facilitate more informed decisions regarding the management and treatment of hyperlitigious behavior.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: None.

  • © 2017 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 45 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 45, Issue 1
1 Mar 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
I'll See You in Court…Again: Psychopathology and Hyperlitigious Litigants
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
I'll See You in Court…Again: Psychopathology and Hyperlitigious Litigants
C. Adam Coffey, Stanley L. Brodsky, David M. Sams
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2017, 45 (1) 62-71;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
I'll See You in Court…Again: Psychopathology and Hyperlitigious Litigants
C. Adam Coffey, Stanley L. Brodsky, David M. Sams
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2017, 45 (1) 62-71;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Hyperlitigious Persons
    • History of Hyperlitigious Behavior
    • Current Management Strategies
    • Hyperlitigious Persons in Real Life
    • An Alternative Conceptualization
    • Hyperlitigious Persons and the Forensic Clinician
    • The Question of Mental Health Treatment
    • What We Don't Know
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Suicide Prevention Effects of Extreme Risk Protection Order Laws in Four States
  • Mental Health and Social Correlates of Reincarceration of Youths as Adults
  • Legal and Ethics Considerations in Capacity Evaluation for Medical Aid in Dying
Show more Regular Articles

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law