Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Article CommentaryAnalysis and Commentary

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and Jail-Based Competency Evaluation and Restoration

Joseph D. Bloom and Scott E. Kirkorsky
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2021, 49 (3) 415-421; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.200099-20
Joseph D. Bloom
Dr. Bloom is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, and Dr. Kirkorsky is Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine-Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott E. Kirkorsky
Dr. Bloom is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, and Dr. Kirkorsky is Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine-Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The U.S. Ninth Circuit is the largest of the federal appeals courts, encompassing the states of Alaska, Washington, and Oregon to the north, Hawaii, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands to the west, California and Arizona to the west and southwest, along with the three intermountain states of Idaho, Montana, and Nevada. The landmass within the Ninth Circuit represents great diversity of geography, climate, population density, and cultural and political traditions. This article considers two landmark Ninth Circuit decisions, one from Oregon and the other from Washington, two states that share geography, culture, and political orientation. Informed by these decisions, we consider how the Ninth Circuit might view the jail-based competency evaluation and restoration programs in the state of Arizona. We explore: the due process rights of jail detainees who are awaiting an evaluation of trial competency; and the time necessary for admission to, and the adequacy of, Arizona's jail-based competency restoration programs after a finding of incompetency.

  • Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
  • jail-based competency to stand trial and restoration
  • due process rights of jail detainees

Footnotes

  • Disclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: None.

  • © 2021 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 49 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 49, Issue 3
1 Sep 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and Jail-Based Competency Evaluation and Restoration
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and Jail-Based Competency Evaluation and Restoration
Joseph D. Bloom, Scott E. Kirkorsky
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2021, 49 (3) 415-421; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.200099-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and Jail-Based Competency Evaluation and Restoration
Joseph D. Bloom, Scott E. Kirkorsky
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2021, 49 (3) 415-421; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.200099-20
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Oregon
    • Washington
    • Arizona
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Toward Aspirational Forensic Mental Health Practice
  • Ethics Challenges in Correctional Mental Health
  • Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Criminal Responsibility
Show more Analysis and Commentary

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
  • jail-based competency to stand trial and restoration
  • due process rights of jail detainees

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law