Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Article

A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases

Melinda DiCiro and Shoba Sreenivasan
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online May 2025, JAAPL.250019-25; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.250019-25
Melinda DiCiro
Dr. DiCiro is Deputy Director and Dr. Sreenivasan is an SVP Evaluator, Forensic Services Division, California Department of State Hospitals, Sacramento, California; Dr. Sreenivasan is an adjunct clinical professor, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
PsyD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shoba Sreenivasan
Dr. DiCiro is Deputy Director and Dr. Sreenivasan is an SVP Evaluator, Forensic Services Division, California Department of State Hospitals, Sacramento, California; Dr. Sreenivasan is an adjunct clinical professor, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    Figure 1. Sources of bias. This figure is from an open-access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (Ref. 1, p 7998), which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes. The author has also given permission for use of the figure.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Six Fallacies and Cognitive Bias Commonly Held by Experts (Ref. 1, p 7999)

    FallacyIncorrect Belief
    1. Ethical issuesIt only happens to corrupt and unscrupulous individuals, an issue of morals and personal integrity, a question of personal character.
    2. Bad applesIt is a question of competency and happens to experts who do not know how to do their job properly.
    3. Expert immunityExperts are impartial and are not affected because bias does not impact competent experts doing their job with integrity.
    4. Technological protectionUsing technology, instrumentation, automation, or artificial intelligence guarantees protection from human biases.
    5. Blind spotOther experts are affected by bias, but not me. I am not biased; it is the other experts who are biased.
    6. Illusion of controlI am aware that bias impacts me, and therefore, I can control and counter its effect. I can overcome bias by mere willpower.
    • This table is from an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License,1 which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for noncommercial purposes. The author has also given permission for use of the table.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 53 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 53, Issue 1
1 Mar 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases
Melinda DiCiro, Shoba Sreenivasan
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online May 2025, JAAPL.250019-25; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.250019-25

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases
Melinda DiCiro, Shoba Sreenivasan
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online May 2025, JAAPL.250019-25; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.250019-25
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Pathways to Bias
    • Approaches to Mitigate Bias
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Benefits of Correctional Psychiatry Teaching and Clinical Exposure for Third-Year Medical Students
  • Bias in Peer Review of Forensic Psychiatry Publications
Show more Regular Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • expert biases
  • Linear Sequential Unmasking
  • decision-making

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law