Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleAnalysis & Commentary

Recent Political and Research Appraisals of the Psychiatric Security Review Board Model

Katherine Michaelsen, Chandrika Shankar and Michael A. Norko
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online March 2026, JAAPL.260006-26; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.260006-26
Katherine Michaelsen
Dr. Michaelsen is an assistant professor, Center for Mental Health, Policy, and the Law, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Dr. Shankar is an associate professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Dr. Norko is Professor Emeritus, Division of Law and Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
MD, MASc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chandrika Shankar
Dr. Michaelsen is an assistant professor, Center for Mental Health, Policy, and the Law, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Dr. Shankar is an associate professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Dr. Norko is Professor Emeritus, Division of Law and Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael A. Norko
Dr. Michaelsen is an assistant professor, Center for Mental Health, Policy, and the Law, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Dr. Shankar is an associate professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Dr. Norko is Professor Emeritus, Division of Law and Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
MD, MAR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Policy and Practice Comparisons Between States52

     Time Limit on Original CommitmentConditional Release ProcessInternal Review Process for Release or DischargeStatutory Language Re Priority or Goals in Decision-MakingRelease from Hospital Decisions
    ORAs ordered, not to exceed max prison sentenceInternal review process grants “CR readiness” privilege prior to requesting that the Board order evaluation for CR by community MH agency; results in hearing before PSRBInternal review process grants “CR readiness” privilege prior to requesting that the Board order evaluation for CR by community MH agencyFrom PSRB Work Group: “protect the public and balance the public’s concern for safety with the rights of the client” (Ref. 27, p 13); from ORS 161.351(3): “the board shall have as its primary concern the protection of society”PSRB
    CTAs ordered, not to exceed max prison sentenceHospital or patient petition PSRB; results in hearing before PSRBConsulting forensic psychiatrists and forensic review committeeSafety of public and well-being of patientPSRB
    AZCommitted for length of possible sentenceCourt and community treatment provider must agree on CR plan; court orders CR and conditionsState hospital, community provider, and court agree on plan for CRPublic safety and protection are primaryCourt
    WANot to exceed max prison sentenceHospital or patient petition court; hospital's materials, recommendations sent to PSRP for review and recommendation, which is sent to the court and designee of Secretary of DSHSForensic evaluator from OFMHS, hospital-based care coordinator, and hospital-based Risk Review BoardSafety of the public primary; petitioner must show by a preponderance of the evidenceCourt
    CAMax possible sentence (for inpatient commitment); conditional release program (CONREP) portion indeterminateHospital medical director recommends CONREP; court decidesHospital medical director or community program director, as applicableDanger to the health and safety of othersCourt
    GACourt may order commitment for six mos; chief medical officer may apply for order of continued hospitalizationTeam drafts CR plan; reviewed by hospital forensic director, external FRC (if serious violent felony), then FRC, then clinical director, then hospital administrator, then to court for hearing and reviewTeam drafts CR plan; reviewed by hospital forensic director, external FRC (if serious violent felony), then FRC, then clinical director, then hospital administratorCivil commitment criteriaCourt
    HINoAfter 90 days, hospital director or patient may applyThree concurrent, independent forensic evaluations completed as part of CR involving felony charges (including at least one psychiatrist)53Danger to persons or propertyCourt
    MASix mos; then one yr recommitmentsNoneMedical director or superintendent, after independent forensic risk assessmentLikelihood of serious harmCourt
    MDIndeterminateHospital requests release hearing with ALJ, who makes recommendation to criminal court. Initial CR is five yrs, can be extendedForensic Review Board for inpatients; “Central Admissions Office” for those on CRDanger to self, others, or propertyCourt
    MENoPsychiatrist files report to Comm’r as soon as person may be released; Comm'r applies to court. In practice, patient encouraged to apply through attorney to facilitate a court dateTreatment team or psychiatrist to Comm'r; review by State Forensic ServiceLikelihood of injury to self or othersCourt
    MNIndeterminateSRB and Comm’r make decision; called “provisional discharge”SRB and Comm’rReasonable degree of safety for the public; will enable person to adjust successfully to communitySRB and Comm’r
    MO54IndeterminateTreatment team to facility FRC, to COO, to state forensic director, to court. Courts generally grant release when DMH supports it. Patient may also requestTreatment team to FRC of facility, to COO, to state forensic directorNot now or likely in reasonable future to commit another violent crime because of mental illness; has capacity to conform behavior to requirements of law in futureCourt
    NCIndeterminateNone; 1st release hearing at 50 days, then 90, then 180, then one yrPeriodic discharge panel meetingsNo longer dangerous or no longer mentally illCourt
    NYOne yr for hospital commitmentComm’r applies to court; hearing held. CR order for five yrs, may be renewed for five yrs indefinitelyTreating clinicians and OMH staff; court rarely disagrees with OMH recommendationPresence of dangerous mental disorderCourt
    OHMax prison sentence; almost always committed for full timeReview by FRT, Forensic Center, and trial courtFRT and Forensic Centers reviewLRA consistent with public safety and welfare of person; preference to public safetyTrial court
    SCMax possible sentenceHospital director requests of courtNot specified in state interagency protocolLikelihood of serious harm; lacks insight or capacity to make responsible decisions re treatmentCourt
    TNNoReviewed by COO and RMRC; court may hold hearing, where COO decision presumed correct but may be challengedRMRC, COOLikelihood of harm unless under court-ordered treatment, other factorsRMRC ± court
    VAIndeterminate; first hearing re continued commitment at one yr; for misdemeanors, max one yrPetition by Comm'r, with CR plan jointly prepared by hospital and community service boardIf one examiner (psychologist or psychiatrist) recommends release, 2nd examiner appointed; if 2nd agrees, recommend release to court and detailed CR plan created with communityDoes not need inpatient, needs outpatient monitoring to prevent deterioration, appropriate outpatient available and significant reason to believe acquittee would comply with conditions and CR will not present “undue risk to public safety” (VA Code § 19.2-182.7)Court
    • ALJ, administrative law judge; Comm’r, Commissioner; COO, Chief Operating Officer; CR, conditional release; DMH, Department of Mental Health; DSHS, Department of Social and Health Services; FRC, forensic review committee; FRT, forensic review team; LRA, least restrictive alternative; MH, mental health; mos, months; OFMHS, Office of Forensic Mental Health Services; OMH, Office of Mental Health; ORS, Oregon Revised Statutes; PSRB, Psychiatric Security Review Board; RMRC, Risk Management Review Committee; SRB, Special Review Board; yr, year.

    • We have noted where we used statutes or additional references outside the survey.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    State Data on Hospitalization, Recidivism

     Average Length of Hospitalization% Acquittees in HospitalRehospitalization RateRearrest Rate under SupervisionRearrest Rate after Discharge from Monitoring
    OR274.1 yrs36%In 2020, 0.63% were revoked and returned to hospital; separately, 25% of court-ordered CR fail within six mos3.6% (felonies and misdemeanors) over seven yrs; annual recidivism rate 0.87%Over seven yrs, 37.8% total (21.9% for felonies; 16% for misdemeanors); n.b. 29% of discharges still in hospital at time of discharge (i.e., no CR time)
    CT2810.7 yrs for those not arrested after discharge from PSRB; 5.8 yrs for those arrested after discharge73%31%2.3% (half dismissed; half for misdemeanor; none for violence)16.3% over avg of 12.5 yrs community exposure (11% for those on CR at time of discharge; 27.9% for those not on CR at discharge)
    AZ41—83.5% ———
    WA—71%Over 5.5 yrs, 30 conditional release returns (variety of reasons)——
    CA64.3-8.2 yrsa—9%16 8.2%-44% during avg of 4.8 yrs follow-upa—
    MD55——31% per yr0.53% for violent crimes; 2.5% per yr for all arrests over five yrs community exposure—
    MO54,567+ yrs at min security; 75.3 mos mean for most serious felonies in those who achieved CR, 92.3 mos for same crimes in those who did not achieve CR54% (1997)2016: 7% per yr (most voluntarily); 2023: 1% (3% highest in recent yrs)——
    NC28.1 yrs for those in hospital; 4.9 yrs for those released100%; once released, no monitoring28% (after final discharge)na15% reconviction (4.9% for violent offenses)
    NY16.33 yrs60% (1/2 in forensic hospitals, 1/2 in civil hospitals)—21% over avg 14 yrs community exposure (11% for violent offense); nearly half during 1st two yrs, 2/3 by yr five—
    VA5761.6 mos—24.4% had CR revoked over three yr period——
    • Blank cells represent data that were unavailable. No data available for GA, HI, MA, ME, MN, OH, SC, and TN.

    • avg, average; CR, conditional release; mos, months; PSRB, Psychiatric Security Review Board; yr, year.

    • ↵aDepending on conditions of release.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    • Text s01, PDF - Text s01, PDF
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 54 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 54, Issue 1
1 Mar 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Recent Political and Research Appraisals of the Psychiatric Security Review Board Model
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Recent Political and Research Appraisals of the Psychiatric Security Review Board Model
Katherine Michaelsen, Chandrika Shankar, Michael A. Norko
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2026, JAAPL.260006-26; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.260006-26

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Recent Political and Research Appraisals of the Psychiatric Security Review Board Model
Katherine Michaelsen, Chandrika Shankar, Michael A. Norko
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2026, JAAPL.260006-26; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.260006-26
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • PSRBs
    • Comparing Practices and Evidence
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Supreme Court of Canada Clarifies the Interpretation of the Insanity Defense in R v. Bharwani
  • A Framework for Developing Mental Health Educational Interventions for Correctional Officers
Show more Analysis & Commentary

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • insanity acquittees
  • conditional release
  • discharge
  • Psychiatric Security Review Board
  • community monitoring
  • recidivism

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2026 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law