RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Forensic Mental Health Evaluators’ Unprocessed Emotions as an Often-Overlooked Form of Bias JF Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online JO J Am Acad Psychiatry Law FD American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law SP JAAPL.230077-23 DO 10.29158/JAAPL.230077-23 A1 Goldenson, Julie A1 Gutheil, Thomas YR 2023 UL http://jaapl.org/content/early/2023/09/25/JAAPL.230077-23.abstract AB There has been robust interest in the influence of cognitive and implicit biases that can hamper a forensic mental health evaluator’s ability to provide objective opinion evidence. By contrast, literature exploring the biasing effects of the examiner’s unacknowledged and unprocessed emotions has been scanty. Borrowing from concepts originating from psychodynamic treatment literature, this article explores how a forensic mental health evaluator’s emotional and transferential reactions can affect the assessment process and formulation of findings. We make the case that forensic mental health evaluators are not impervious to their own mental health concerns, including vicarious trauma. We ultimately argue for a cultural shift in forensic practice that acknowledges the unavoidable existence and influence of a forensic evaluator’s human emotions, personal reactions, and conflicts, so that strategies can be developed for compassionate but careful management in training programs, supervision, and beyond. We suggest that self-reflection, sometimes with the aid of consultation and psychotherapeutic support, is not only important for clinical trainees but also could serve forensic practitioners throughout their careers, especially during challenging junctures in their personal and professional lives.