PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Stanley L. Brodsky
AU  - Phil Heller
TI  - Addressing the Perfect Phantom on the Witness Stand
DP  - 2008 Dec 01
TA  - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
PG  - 541--543
VI  - 36
IP  - 4
4099  - http://jaapl.org/content/36/4/541.short
4100  - http://jaapl.org/content/36/4/541.full
SO  - J Am Acad Psychiatry Law2008 Dec 01; 36
AB  - When expert witnesses are cross-examined, a common gambit of opposing counsel is to create a phantom for comparison purposes. The constructed phantom is typically portrayed as an individual who has gone through similar, difficult life circumstances without the impairments or problematic behavioral sequelae of the plaintiff or defendant in the trial. Abuse histories, assaults, and traumatic experiences all are posited to have little effect on this phantom other, an invulnerability that leads us to call this construct the Perfect Phantom. In this article, the nature of the Perfect Phantom cross-examination is described, along with strategies for coping with these questions.