RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 “Magical Thinking,” Suicide, and Malpractice Litigation
JF Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
JO J Am Acad Psychiatry Law
FD American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
SP 369
OP 377
VO 16
IS 4
A1 Bursztajn, Harold
A1 Gutheil, Thomas G.
A1 Brodsky, Archie
A1 Swagerty, Evelynne L.
YR 1988
UL http://jaapl.org/content/16/4/369.abstract
AB Prospective clinical assessment of suicidality differs significantly from that used retrospectively in malpractice litigation. In the latter context, the judge or jury may be susceptible to hindsight reasoning and a disproportionate emphasis on the specific method of suicide, exaggerating its foreseeability and “magically” linking the means of death to the treating clinician, especially in the case of suicide by an overdose of prescribed medication. Such magical thinking, moreover, is rooted in the clinical context of suicide: The errors of reasoning observed in the courtroom exhibit striking parallels with the mind-set of the suicidal patient. An understanding of these dynamics suggests appropriate precautions for the clinician and thus contributes to the prevention both of suicide and of malpractice litigation.