PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Murray, Martha
TI  - Commentary: The Case of <em>Poliner v. Texas Health Systems</em>
DP  - 2012 Apr 01
TA  - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
PG  - 202--205
VI  - 40
IP  - 2
4099  - http://jaapl.org/content/40/2/202.short
4100  - http://jaapl.org/content/40/2/202.full
SO  - J Am Acad Psychiatry Law2012 Apr 01; 40
AB  - Fear of litigious reprisal may deter potential peer reviewers from participation in the medical peer review process. The federal Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986, as elucidated in Poliner v. Texas Health Systems, encourages effective peer review by conferring immunity on peer reviewers, so long as they ensure adequate due process. The American Psychiatric Association's “Procedures for Handling Complaints of Unethical Conduct ” offers a system for peer review that promotes improvements in quality of care, fairness to respondent physicians, and protection for peer reviewers.