Spearman Coefficient for the Correlation Between TABS and Immature Defense Mechanism Scores | P | Spearman Coefficient for the Correlation Between TABS and Neurotic Defense Mechanism Scores | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | ||||
Male | .50 | < .01 | .20 | .30 |
Female | .56 | < .01 | .43 | .02 |
Profession | ||||
Psychiatrist | .41 | .01 | .09 | .55 |
Psychologist | .62 | < .01 | .49 | .03 |
Length of forensic expertise | ||||
> 10.5 y | .50 | < .01 | .22 | .24 |
≤ 10.5 y | .38 | .04 | .34 | .06 |
Previous Psychotherapy | ||||
Yes | .44 | < .01 | .27 | .04 |
No | .90 | .03 | .90 | .03 |
Psychotherapy expertise | ||||
Yes | .49 | < .01 | .23 | .18 |
No | .30 | .17 | .32 | .14 |
Time between forensic evaluation and study participation | ||||
> 4.5 months | .36 | .05 | .31 | .09 |
≤ 4.5 months | .34 | .07 | .26 | .17 |
n = 56 participants.
Immature and neurotic defense mechanisms were evaluated with the Defensive Style Questionnaire (DSQ); vicarious trauma was evaluated with the Trauma and Attachment Belief Scale (TABS). The strength of correlation is classified as follows: .0–.19 = very weak; .20–39 = weak; .40–.59 = moderate; .60–.79 = strong; .8–1.0 = very strong.