Table 2

Experience With Tarasoff Warnings Among Florida Law Enforcement Agencies

QuestionTotalPoliceSheriff911p
n = 129n  = 91n  = 29n  = 9
1Agency has a policy and/or procedure on what to do if a mental health provider calls in expressing concern about a patient making a threat towards others but not a threat towards themselves.107 (82.9)74 (81.3)26 (89.6)7 (77.8).532
1aThis policy or procedure is the same as if the patient was expressing a threat to harm just themselves.88 (68.2)65 (71.4)19 (65.5)4 (44.4).180
2The information is disseminated to the general law enforcement officers on duty if a warning is received.119 (92.3)85 (93.4)26 (89.6)8 (88.9).746
2aThe warning is transmitted to the next shift within a 24-hour period.112 (86.8)80 (87.9)25 (86.2)7 (77.8).867
2bThe warning is disseminated to a specific unit or active officer.8 (6.2)4 (4.4)3 (10.3)1 (11.1).643
3Agency has a policy or procedure to notify a potential victim if a specific victim is identifiable.115 (89.1)82 (90.1)24 (82.7)9 (100.0).300
4Agency has a policy or procedure to notify a locational authority (e.g., management) if no specific individual is threatened but a general location is identified in a threat (e.g., workplace, school, entertainment venue).118 (91.4)81 (89.0)28 (96.5)9 (100.0).634
5Agency has a policy or procedure to monitor a potential victim if a specific individual is identified.77 (59.6)54 (59.3)16 (55.2)7 (77.8).478
6Agency has a policy or procedure to monitor a potential location if a specific location is identified.104 (80.6)74 (81.3)22 (75.9)8 (88.9).848
7.Agency has a policy or procedure to document a warning call from a mental health provider.116 (89.9)82 (90.1)27 (93.1)7 (77.8).408
8.Agency has a policy or procedure to notify a state body for additional action or information tracking purposes when a mental health provider calls (e.g., the Florida Department of Law Enforcement).38 (29.5)28 (30.7)8 (27.6)2 (25.0).404
9.Officer responding to this survey has knowledge or education regarding the court case/ruling known as Tarasoff.56 (43.4)37 (40.6)17 (58.6)2 (22.2).002*
9a.Officer has a good functional/working understanding of the Tarasoff case.48 (37.2)32 (35.2)15 (51.7)1 (11.1).335
  • Data are presented as n (%).

  • * p < .05.