Table 3.

Odds Ratios from Multinomial Logistic Regression Analyses of Reporting Different Forms of Aggression on Cannabis Use Disorder

Cannabis use disorder (C)Reporting of aggression (A)
SDA vs. NAODA vs. NACA vs. NAODA vs. SDA
Unadjusted modelBest-fita modelUnadjusted modelBest-fita modelUnadjusted modelBest-fita modelUnadjusted modelBest-fita model
OR (95% CI)aOR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)aOR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)aOR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)aOR (95% CI)
None (Reference)1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00
Positive5.08 (4.19–6.17)1.10 (0.881.38)9.57 (8.71–10.52)1.42 (1.26–1.60)20.77 (14.83–29.10)2.11 (1.36–3.26)1.88 (1.50–2.37)1.29 (0.971.69)
  • SDA, self-directed aggression; ODA, other-directed aggression; CA, combined aggression; NA, non-aggressive; OR, odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval. Values significantly different from “none” are in bold (p < 0.05).

  • a Adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, survey year, marital status, education level, past-year employment, personal income level, religiosity, past-year tobacco use, past-year other drug use disorders, past-year psychiatric disorder, juvenile substance use, past-year mental health treatment and past-year substance use treatment.