Table 4.

Odds Ratios from Multinomial Logistic Regression Analyses of Reporting Different Forms of Aggression on Cannabis Use Disorder among Individuals 18–25 Years Old

Cannabis use disorder (C)Reporting of aggression (A)
SDA vs. NAODA vs. NAODA vs. SDA
Unadjusted modelBest-fita modelUnadjusted modelBest-fita modelUnadjusted modelBest-fita model
Or (95%CI)aOR (95%CI)Or (95%CI)aOR (95%CI)Or (95%CI)aOR (95%CI)
None (Reference)1.001.001.001.001.001.00
Positive2.74 (2.24–3.34)1.07 (0.85–1.35)3.88 (3.57–4.23)1.38 (1.23–1.54)1.42 (1.16–1.74)1.29 (1.03–1.62)
  • SDA, self-directed aggression; ODA, other-directed aggression; NA, non-aggressive; OR, odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval. Values significantly different from “none” are in bold (p < 0.05).

  • * The “Combined Aggression” category was omitted from the analysis due to low sample size.

  • a Adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, survey year, marital status, education level, past-year employment, personal income level, religiosity, past-year tobacco use, past-year alcohol and other drug use disorders, past-year psychiatric disorder, juvenile substance use, past-year mental health treatment and past-year alcohol use treatment.