Table 2

Comparison of Characteristics Surrounding the Homicides Between Predominantly Impulsive and Proactive Groups

All Subjects (N = 47)Predominant Impulsive (n = 27)Predominant Proactive (n = 20)
n%n%n%Test Statistics, p
Psychotically motivated homicide4493.62488.920100χ2 = 2.374; p = .251a
Multiple victims510.6311.1210χ2 = . 015; p = 1.000a
Treatment nonadherence in the index homicide4289.42488.91890χ2 = . 015; p = 1.000a
Victim-perpetrator relationshipχ2 = 8.096; p = .424
 Parents1429.8829.6630
 Intimate partner510.613.7420
 Children12.10015
 Siblings612.8414.8210
 Nonfamily acquaintance1736.11140.8630
 Stranger48.5311.115
Method/weaponχ2 = 8.646; p = .029
 Sharp instrument3268.12177.81155
 Firearmsb714.913.7630
 Blunt510.6414.815.0
 Strangulation24.313.715
 Pushing from a height12.10015
Placeχ2 = 2.605; p = .107
 Public place1838.31348.1525
 Private property2961.71451.91575
Intoxicated offenderχ2 = 1.897; p = .387
 No39832177.81890
 Alcohol612.8414.8210
 Drugs24.327.400
Accompanying delusionsχ2 = 13.653; p = .006
 No48.5414.800
 Persecutory/threat1531.91140.7420
 Referential/Control-override612.8518.515
 Infidelityb81727.4630
 More than one type1429.8518.5945
Accompanying hallucinationsχ2 = 3.758; p = .289
 No3472.31866.71680
 Auditory-Command1021.3725.9315
 Auditory-Elementary24.327.400
 Visual12.10015
  • aFisher’s exact test.

  • bPost-hoc between-group proportions (impulsive vs. proactive) show significant differences.

  • p < .05 statistically significant (bold values).