Results from Exploratory Ordinary Least Squares Regression Analysis
Model | β | t | p |
---|---|---|---|
Model 1: Quiz scores regressed on predictors | |||
Fixed effects | |||
Intercept | — | 16.86 | .000 |
Perceived importance of training | .083 | 1.99 | .047 |
Change from current practice | −.203 | −4.79 | .000 |
Training level | .093 | 2.19 | .029 |
Number of trainings | .030 | 0.75 | .453 |
Pretraining competence | −.075 | −1.72 | .085 |
Model 2: Change scores regressed on predictors | |||
Fixed effects | |||
Intercept | — | 3.26 | .001 |
Perceived importance of training | −.003 | −.06 | .953 |
Change from current practice | −.088 | −1.96 | .051 |
Training level | .086 | 1.86 | .063 |
Number of trainings | −.045 | −1.08 | .282 |
Pretraining competence | −.050 | −1.09 | .279 |
Model 3: Competence regressed on predictors | |||
Fixed effects | |||
Intercept | — | 4.59 | .000 |
Perceived importance of training | .276 | 12.85 | .000 |
Change from current practice | .033 | 1.52 | .129 |
Training level | .140 | 6.33 | .000 |
Number of trainings | .045 | 2.27 | .023 |
Pretraining competence | .558 | 25.44 | .000 |
Model 3: Practice outcomes regressed on predictors | |||
Fixed effects | |||
Intercept | — | 32.68 | .000 |
Perceived importance of training | .343 | 10.34 | .000 |
Change from current practice | .048 | 1.45 | .149 |
Training level | .177 | 5.20 | .000 |
Number of trainings | −.067 | −2.19 | .029 |
Pretraining competence | −.056 | −1.66 | .097 |