Table 5

Cox Proportional Hazard Regression Testing the Predictive Validity of the SAM Static and Dynamic Risk Indicators

	Stalking			Violence			Rehospitalization
	β	SE	HR (95% CI)	β	SE	HR (95% CI)	β	SE	HR (95% CI)
Step 1
Previous – Nature of Stalking	−.06	.06	.95 (.84, 1.07)	−.07	.07	.93 (.82, 1.07)	−.13	.06	.88 (.78, .99)^a
Previous – Perpetrator Risk Factors	.11	.08	1.12 (.95, 1.31)	.32	.11	1.37 (1.10, 1.70)^b	.16	.08	1.18 (1.00, 1.39)^a
Step 1
Previous – Nature of Stalking	−.03	.06	.97 (.86, 1.10)	−.04	.07	.96 (.84, 1.11)	−.18	.07	.84 (.74, .96) b
Previous – Perpetrator Risk Factors	.09	.10	1.09 (.89, 1.33)	.28	.12	1.32 (1.05, 1.67)^a	.23	.09	1.25 (1.04, 1.51)^a
Current – Nature of Stalking	.14	.06	1.15 (1.03, 1.29)^b	−.04	.07	.96 (.84, 1.11)	.11	.06	1.12 (.99, 1.27)
Current – Perpetrator Risk Factors	.07	.08	1.07 (.92, 1.26)	.11	.08	1.12 (.95, 1.31)	−.11	.07	.90 (.78, 1.03)

↵HR = Hazard ratio.
Model results: Stalking: χ² (4, n = 80) = 19.37, p = .001. Violence: χ² (4, n = 80) = 10.13, p = .04. Rehospitalization: χ² (4, n = 65) = 10.46, p = .03.
↵a p ≤ .05.
↵b p ≤ .01.