Table 5

Outcomes and Classification of PHP Monitoring for Unprofessional Sexual Behavior

Outcome	Levels	Total Sample (N = 570)	Monitored Group (n = 232)	Unmonitored Group (n = 338)	p	Cramer’s V
Outcome of PHP participation^{^a}	Still under initial monitoring agreement^{^b}	28 (4.9%)	28 (12.1%)	0 (0.0%)	.0005	.877
	Successfully completed monitoring without relapse^{^b}	105 (18.4%)	105 (45.3%)	0 (0.0%)
	Successfully completed extended monitoring agreement^{^b}	23 (4.0%)	23 (9.9%)	0 (0.0%)
	Completed initial monitoring but rereferred to PHP	3 (.5%)	3 (1.3%)	0 (0.0%)
	Discontinued PHP involvement against recommendation (relinquished license)	68 (11.9%)	27 (11.6%)	41 (12.1%)
	Turned over to licensing board for noncompliance with PHP recommendations	50 (8.8%)	22 (9.5%)	28 (8.3%)
	No monitoring agreement signed because licensing board took action first^{^b}	44 (7.7%)	0 (0.0%)	44 (13.0%)
	Licensing board denied or revoked license during monitoring period^{^b}	8 (1.4%)	8 (3.4%)	0 (0.0%)
	PHP monitoring was not appropriate^{^b}	221 (38.8%)	0 (0.0%)	221 (65.4%)
	Other^{^b,^c}	20 (3.5%)	16 (6.9%)	4 (1.2%)
Monitoring Success	Levels	Total Sample (N = 570)	Monitored Group (n = 232)
Evaluated in terms of meeting the dual missions of assisting professionals with potentially impairing conditions and protecting patient safety^{^a,^d}	Very unsuccessful	11 (1.9%)	11 (4.7%)
	Unsuccessful	21 (3.7%)	21 (9.1%)
	Neutral	27 (4.7%)	27 (11.6%)
	Successful	59 (10.4%)	59 (25.4%)
	Very successful	114 (20.0%)	114 (49.1%)
	No monitoring agreement (contract)	338 (59.3%)	0 (0.0%)

PHP, professional health monitoring program
↵a Fisher's exact test.
↵b Levels reflect significant differences between groups.
↵c Individual was incarcerated or died.
↵d Monitoring success was determined by the first author, in consultation with the final author, based on chart review.