Nonclinical Questions Posed Regarding Frotteurism
Templeman and Stinnett13 |
Two questions were posed; an answer in the affirmative (i.e., any response other than zero) to either question resulted in the participant's being categorized as a frotteur for purposes of prevalence: |
“How many times have you ever intentionally rubbed up (in a sexual way) against someone who did not know you, against his/her will in a crowd?” (a) 0, (b) 1, (c) 2–5, (d) 6–10 (e) 11–15,…” OR |
“How many times have you intentionally touched with your hands (in a sexual way) someone who did not know you, against his/her will in a crowd? (a) 0, (b) 1, (c) 2–5, (d) 6–10, (e) 11–15” |
Freund and Seto14 |
Two questions were posed; an answer in the affirmative (i.e., a yes) to both questions resulted in the participant's being categorized as a frotteur for purposes of prevalence: |
“Since age 16, have you ever attempted to fondle the breasts or crotch of an unsuspecting female who was almost or totally a stranger?” AND |
“Since age 16, have you ever stood behind an unsuspecting female who was almost or totally a stranger to you and pressed (intentionally) your penis against her buttocks?” |
Yajima15 |
One question was posed, and two separate prevalence values were calculated, depending on the number of participants who selected option a) or b), respectively: |
[translated from Japanese] “I would like to ask about your sexual preferences. With regard to the following, would you want to engage in the activity? Chikan: a) very much, b) if it were only once” |
Kar and Koola16 |
One true-or-false question was posed, and a response of true classified the participant as a frotteur for purposes of prevalence: |
“I rub genitals against people for sexual stimulation in crowded public places. True or False” |