Table 5

Evaluation of Differences in the Decision to Uphold Case 1 or 2

	Model A			Model B			Model C
	Estimate	Standard error	p	Estimate	Standard error	p	Estimate	Standard error	p
Intercept	0.975	0.398	.014	−2.120	0.380	.000	0.340	0.586	.566
Case	−2.192	0.335	.000	2.224	0.341	.000	−2.041	0.966	.035
Testator gender (female vs. male)	−0.141	0.325	.666	0.522	0.380	.169	0.868	0.881	.325
Judge gender (female vs. male)	0.894	0.386	.021	1.718	0.573	.003	1.678	0.791	.034
Testator gender: judge Gender				−1.569	0.779	.044	−1.115	1.108	.314
Case: testator gender							0.278	1.327	.834
Case: judge gender							−0.034	1.157	.976
Case: testator gender: judge gender							−0.694	1.557	.656

A generalized linear mixed-effects regression model with random intercepts was used for repeated assessments. Model A includes main effects only. Model B adds a planned, two-way interaction of testator gender by judge gender. Model C adds an additional evaluation of the three-way interaction along with all lower order terms.