Table 5

Legal Variables in Respondents' Most Recent Criminal Forensic Case Involving PTSD

Combat ExposedNoncombat ExposedTotalCombat vs. Noncombat
Retaining agent(n = 38)(n = 63)(n = 107)χ2 = 1.179, df = 2, p = .56*
    Defense50 (19)53 (34)53 (57)
    Court40 (15)30 (19)33 (35)
    Prosecution11 (4)16 (10)14 (15)
Defense claim(n = 35)(n = 59)(n = 97)
    Not guilty by reason of insanity49 (17)25 (15)34 (33)χ2 = 5.24, df = 1, p = .022
    Diminished responsibility37 (13)44 (26)41 (40)χ2 = .434, df = 1, p = .510
Other legal claims(n = 28)(n = 48)(n = 79)
    Mitigation86 (24)77 (37)80 (63)χ2 = .832, df = 1, p = .362
    Incompetent to stand trial4 (1)16 (8)11 (9)χ2 = 2.90 df = 1, p = .0883
    Other18 (5)15 (7)18 (14)χ2 = .143, df = 1, p = .706
Stages psychiatric evidence introduced(n = 37)(n = 62)(n = 107)
    Pretrial68 (25)66 (41)67 (72)χ2 = .022, df = 1, p = .883
    Trial41 (15)36 (22)37 (40)χ2 = .253, df = 1, p = .615
    Sentencing30 (11)40 (25)36 (38)χ2 = .608, df = 1, p = .436
Expert's opinion on legal claim(n = 37)(n = 58)(n = 98)
    Valid60 (22)47 (27)50 (49)χ2 = 1.510, df = 1, p = .220
    Invalid40 (15)53 (31)50 (49)
Opposing expert retained(n = 37)(n = 60)(n = 101)
    Yes24 (9)38 (23)34 (34)χ2 = 2.03, df = 1, p = .154
    No35 (13)25 (15)29 (29)
    Don't know22 (8)23 (14)23 (23)χ2 = .0382, df = 1, p = .845
    Not applicable19 (7)13 (8)15 (15)χ2 = .546, df = 1, p = .460
Agreement between opposing experts(n = 9)(n = 23)(n = 34)
    PTSD present
        Yes89 (8)26 (6)41 (14)χ2 = 6.801, df = 1, p = .014§
        No11 (1)48 (11)41 (14)
        Don't know0 (0)26 (6)18 (6)χ2 = 2.89, df = 1, p = .0891
    Legal claim
        Yes56 (5)35 (8)41 (14)χ2 = 1.16, df = 1, p = .282
        No33 (3)39 (9)38 (13)
        Don't know11 (1)26 (6)21 (7)χ2 = .849, df = 1, p = .357
  • Data are expressed as the percentage of the group of respondents (n).

  • * Log-linear regression.

  • Respondents instructed to select as many as applied.

  • Plea-bargaining and charges dropped.

  • § Fisher's exact test.