Table 2

Components of Criminal Cyberstalking and Cyberharassment Laws by State

	Age of Offender	Age of Victim	Jurisdiction	Integrated Offline and Online^*	Definition of Electronics	Evaluation Treatment^†	Sex Offense Registration	Sexual Solicitation	Allows Use of a Device	Protective Order	Family Member^‡
Alabama				■						■	■
Alaska		■		■				■			■
Arkansas					■	■		■	■	■
Arizona				■	■				■	■
California			■	■	■	■	■			■	■
Colorado			■	■	■			■		■	■
Connecticut		■	■	■	■	■				■
Delaware	■	■		■				■	■	■
District of Columbia			■	■	■
Florida		■	■	■	■					■	■
Georgia				■	■	■				■	■
Hawaii				■	■	■
Idaho		■		■						■	■
Illinois	■	■			■	■			■	■	■
Indiana				■	■			■		■
Iowa
Kansas				■	■				■	■	■
Kentucky				■				■		■
Louisiana	■	■	■		■				■
Maine				■						■	■
Maryland					■			■
Massachusetts				■	■					■
Michigan	■	■	■	■	■	■				■	■
Minnesota	■	■	■	■		■		■		■
Mississippi			■				■		■	■	■
Missouri	■	■		■						■	■
Montana				■	■			■		■
Nebraska		■		■						■	■
Nevada			■	■	■						■
New Hampshire			■	■						■	■
New Jersey			■	■	■					■	■
New Mexico		■		■		■		■		■
New York	■	■		■							■
North Carolina			■	■	■				■	■	■
North Dakota			■	■						■	■
Ohio		■			■			■	■		■
Oklahoma			■	■					■	■	■
Oregon			■	■	■			■	■	■	■
Pennsylvania			■		■			■		■	■
Rhode Island		■		■	■			■		■	■
South Carolina				■	■			■	■	■	■
South Dakota		■		■				■	■	■
Tennessee	■	■	■	■		■	■			■	■
Texas				■	■			■	■		■
Utah			■	■	■					■	■
Vermont		■	■	■				■
Virginia			■	■				■		■	■
Washington			■		■			■		■
West Virginia			■		■			■	■	■	■
Wisconsin		■						■	■		■
Wyoming				■				■		■	■
Federal								■			■
Total	8	19	23	40	29	10	3	24	16	39	34

↵* States in which the same anti-stalking statute applies to both online and offline stalking behavior.
↵† States whose anti-stalking statute allows for court-mandated psychiatric evaluation or treatment for perpetrators either pre- or post-conviction.
↵‡ States whose anti-stalking statute explicitly criminalizes the transmission of threatening statements made to the victim about their family members.