Skip to main content
Log in

A 15-year national follow-up: legislation is not enough to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Seclusion and restraint are frequent but controversial coercive measures used in psychiatric treatment. Legislative efforts have started to emerge to control the use of these measures in many countries. In the present study, the nationwide trends in the use of seclusion and restraint were investigated in Finland over a 15-year span which was characterised by legislative changes aiming to clarify and restrict the use of these measures.

Method

The data were collected during a predetermined week in 1990, 1991, 1994, 1998 and 2004, using a structured postal survey of Finnish psychiatric hospitals. The numbers of inpatients during the study weeks were obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Register.

Results

The total number of the secluded and restrained patients declined as did the number of all inpatients during the study weeks, but the risk of being secluded or restrained remained the same over time when compared to the first study year. The duration of the restraint incidents did not change, but the duration of seclusion increased. A regional variation was found in the use of coercive measures.

Conclusion

Legislative changes solely cannot reduce the use of seclusion and restraint or change the prevailing treatment cultures connected with these measures. The use of seclusion and restraint should be vigilantly monitored and ethical questions should be under continuous scrutiny.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Act on the Status and Rights of patients (2004) So 422. In: Suomen Laki II [Finnish Law II]. Talentum Media Oy, Helsinki, pp 1621–1624

  2. Angold A (1989) Seclusion. Br J Psychiatry 154:437–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Betemps EJ, Somoza E, Buncher CR (1993) Hospital characteristics, diagnoses, and staff reasons associated with use of seclusion and restraint. Hosp Community Psychiatry 44:367–371

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown JS, Tooke SK (1992) On the seclusion of psychiatric patients. Soc Sci Med 35:711–721

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Council of Europe (1994) Recommendation 1235 on psychiatry and human rights. Council of Europe, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  6. Council of Europe (2004) Recommendation Rec(2004)10 of the committee of ministers to member states concerning the protection of the human rights and dignity of persons with mental disorder and its explanatory memorandum. Council of Europe, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crenshaw WB, Cain KA, Francis PS (1997) An updated national survey on seclusion and restraint. Psychiatr Serv 48:395–397

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Currier GW, Farley-Toombs C (2002) Datapoints: use of restraint before and after implementation of the new HCFA rules. Psychiatr Serv 53:138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Donat DC (2003) An analysis of successful efforts to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint at a public psychiatric hospital. Psychiatr Serv 54:1119–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Donovan A, Plant R, Peller A, Siegel L, Martin A (2003) Two-year trends in the use of seclusion and restraint among psychiatrically hospitalized youths. Psychiatr Serv 54:987–993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. D’Orio BM, Purselle D, Stevens D, Garlow SJ (2004) Reduction of episodes of seclusion and restraint in a psychiatric emergency system. Psychiatr Serv 55:581–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher WA (1994) Seclusion and restraint: a review of the literature. Am J Psychiatry 151:1584–1591

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Flannery RB, Juliano J, Cronin S, Walker AP (2006) Characteristics of assaultive psychiatric patients: fifteen-year analysis of the assaulted staff action program (ASAP). Psychiatr Q 77:239–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jonikas JA, Cook JA, Rosen C, Laris A, Kim J-B (2004) Brief reports: a program to reduce use of physical restraint in psychiatric inpatient facilities. Psychiatr Serv 55:818–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Korkeila J (1998) Perspectives on the public psychiatric services in Finland. Stakes, research report 93. Gummerus Printing, Jyväskylä, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  16. Korkeila J, Tuohimäki C, Kaltiala-Heino R, Lehtinen V, Joukamaa M (2002) Predicting use of coercive measures in Finland. Nord J Psychiatry 56:339–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lendemeijer B, Shortridge-Baggett L (1997) The use of seclusion in psychiatry: a literature review. Sch Inq Nurs Pract 11:299–315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McCrue RE, Urcuyo L, Lilu Y (2004) Reducing restraint use in a public psychiatric inpatient service. J Behav Health Serv Res 31:217–224

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mental Health Act (2004) So 409. In: Suomen Laki II. [Finnish Law II]. Talentum Media Oy, Helsinki, pp 1598–1605

  20. Niveau G (2004) Preventing human rights abuses in psychiatric establishments: the work of the CPT. Eur Psychiatry 19:146–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Okin RL (1985) Variation among state hospitals in use of seclusion and restraint. Hosp Community Psychiatry 36:648–652

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pirkola S, Sohlman B (eds) (2005) Atlas of mental health – statistics from Finland. National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health (Stakes), Helsinki, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sailas E, Fenton M (2000) Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD001163

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sailas E, Wahlbeck K (2005) Seclusion and restraint in psychiatric inpatient wards. Curr Opin Psychiatry 18:555–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Salib E, Ahmed AG, Cope M (1998) Practice of seclusion: a five-year retrospective review in North Cheshire. Med Sci Law 38:321–327

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Way BB, Banks SM (1990) Use of seclusion and restraint in public psychiatric hospitals: patient characteristics and facility effects. Hosp Community Psychiatry 41:75–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. World Psychiatric Association (1996) Declaration of Madrid. 10th World Congress of Psychiatry, Madrid, Spain

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alice Keski-Valkama MSc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keski-Valkama, A., Sailas, E., Eronen, M. et al. A 15-year national follow-up: legislation is not enough to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 42, 747–752 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0219-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0219-7

Key words

Navigation