SeriesWho has been caring for the baby?
Introduction
During the 1990s, more than 4 million neonatal deaths worldwide each year were hardly mentioned in global health circles, and newborn care was perceived as technical, expensive, and deficient in cost-effective solutions feasible for low-income countries.1, 2, 3 It was widely assumed that investment in newborn health should wait until countries had greater wealth and more functional health systems. These myths were challenged in 1999, when Abhay Bang published results4 from rural India showing that a home-based package of maternal and newborn health interventions delivered by community health workers (CHWs) could reduce neonatal mortality by 62%. In 2000, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation funded Save the Children's Saving Newborn Lives initiative to develop evidence, policy, and programmes to improve global newborn survival. The Lancet Child Survival Series in 20035 catalysed rethinking of the global child-health agenda, and noted the important burden of newborn deaths, but at the time details were insufficient on neonatal causes of death, interventions (especially at community level), and how to deliver newborn care at scale in low-resource settings.5, 6, 7
In 2005, the Lancet Neonatal Survival Series sought to accelerate action by describing the timing, causes, and location of neonatal deaths;8, 9 identifying highly cost-effective interventions that could avert more than two-thirds of neonatal deaths, including about a third through community care;10 and outlining how these solutions can be delivered by integration and scaling up at both facility and community levels11 for an estimated additional cost of US$1 per person, of which about 70% would also benefit mothers and older children.1 A “new category of vulnerable persons that did not exist in the minds of many global health actors”12 received widespread attention for the first time, driven especially by the recognition that Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 4 for child survival could not be achieved without increased attention to newborn health.1 An ambitious call was made for ownership of newborn health outcomes across the continuum of care for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health and nutrition (RMNCH) for women and children, and linking community, outreach, and facility care. 1 year later progress seemed promising,2 but in 2013, the independent Expert Review Group of the UN Secretary General's Every Woman Every Child movement highlighted that neonatal deaths still need more attention, and they account for an increasing proportion (now 44%) of deaths of children younger than 5 years.13, 14
This paper is the first in a five-part Series on newborn health and survival and stillbirths15, 16, 17, 18 in which we analyse the extent to which the 2005 call to action in the Lancet was acted on, in the broader context of changes in global health (panel 1). We acknowledge that measurement of effects on policy and practice is complex,19, 20 and do not seek to attribute changes to the Lancet Neonatal Survival Series; rather, we aim to assess what has changed and, if something has not, then why not, as a basis for accelerating progress for every newborn baby (figure 1).
Section snippets
Agenda setting
We rate agenda setting for newborn health (figure 1) overall as “green”, indicating major advances (figure 2, appendix). This shows the rapidity with which evidence has been generated and disseminated. As noted by Shiffman,12 “Researchers produced reviews of evidence that summarised successful strategies for newborn care and made this information widely available in forms accessible to policy makers and programme managers.” Although the evidence base is incomplete, especially for prevention of
Conclusion
During the past decade, progress has been made in each category of the heuristic policy process (figure 2). Remarkably, rapid progress occurred in agenda setting, and newborn babies have shifted from being almost invisible on the global health agenda in the 1990s to being a central element in the RMNCH continuum of care in several countries. However, in view of the size of the burden (almost 10% of the Global Burden of Disease 2010, without including 2·6 million stillbirths),112 the potential
References (113)
- et al.
Neonatal survival: a call for action
Lancet
(2005) - et al.
1 year after The Lancet Neonatal Survival Series—was the call for action heard?
Lancet
(2006) - et al.
Effect of home-based neonatal care and management of sepsis on neonatal mortality: field trial in rural India
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
Where and why are 10 million children dying every year?
Lancet
(2003) - et al.
The unfinished agenda in child survival
Lancet
(2013) - et al.
4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why?
Lancet
(2005) - et al.
Why are 4 million newborn babies dying each year?
Lancet
(2004) - et al.
Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save?
Lancet
(2005) - et al.
Systematic scaling up of neonatal care in countries
Lancet
(2005) Issue attention in global health: the case of newborn survival
Lancet
(2010)
Progress towards Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5 on maternal and child mortality: an updated systematic analysis
Lancet
Stillbirths: why they matter
Lancet
National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications
Lancet
Stillbirths: breaking the silence of a hidden grief
Lancet
Consensus on kangaroo mother care acceleration
Lancet
Stillbirths: the vision for 2020
Lancet
Stillbirths: where? When? Why? How to make the data count?
Lancet
Women's groups practising participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lancet
A solution pathway for preterm birth: accelerating a priority research agenda
Lancet Glob Health
Health and health-care systems in southeast Asia: diversity and transitions
Lancet
Alma-Ata 30 years on: revolutionary, relevant, and time to revitalise
Lancet
Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works
Lancet
Community-driven impact of a newborn-focused behavioral intervention on maternal health in Shivgarh, India
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality
Lancet
Countdown to 2015: changes in official development assistance to maternal, newborn, and child health in 2009–10, and assessment of progress since 2003
Lancet
Effect of community-based newborn-care intervention package implemented through two service-delivery strategies in Sylhet district, Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
Lancet
Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: cluster-randomised controlled trial
Lancet
Factors in health initiative success: learning from Nepal's newborn survival initiative
Soc Sci Med
Knowledge into action for child survival
Lancet
Levels and trends in child mortality: report 2013
Every woman and every child: strengthening equity and dignity through health
Progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival
Lancet
Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost?
Lancet
Health-systems bottlenecks and strategies to accelerate scale-up in countries
Lancet
From evidence to action to deliver a healthy start for the next generation
Lancet
The foundations of policy analysis
Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems
Every Newborn: An action plan to end preventable newborn deaths
Newborn survival: a multi-country analysis of a decade of change
Health Policy Plan
State of the world's children
Neonatal mortality levels for 193 countries in 2009 with trends since 1990: a systematic analysis of progress, projections, and priorities
PLoS Med
Child mortality estimation: a comparison of UN IGME and IHME estimates of levels and trends in under-five mortality rates and deaths
PLoS Med
Beyond newborn survival: the world you are born into determines your risk of disability-free survival
Pediatr Res
The Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group reviews of the effectiveness of interventions to reduce maternal, neonatal and child mortality
Int J Epidemiol
Assumptions and methods in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). Introduction
BMC Public Health
Overview of the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)
BMC Public Health
PMNCH, Save the Children, WHO. Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth
15 million babies “Born too soon”. Parents, professionals and politicians come together to amplify the evidence through media and public events. Maximising Research Impact
15 million preterm births annually: what has changed this year?
Reprod Health
Cited by (131)
Donor aid mentioning newborns and stillbirths, 2002–19: an analysis of levels, trends, and equity
2023, The Lancet Global HealthResearch funding for newborn health and stillbirths, 2011–20: a systematic analysis of levels and trends
2023, The Lancet Global HealthFraming and the formation of global health priorities
2022, The Lancet