Work potential of road accident survivors with post-traumatic stress disorder

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.03.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Work potential in adult survivors of road accidents with and without post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was examined at a mean of 8.6 months (SD=3.77) post-accident. All participants were working prior to their accident. Results showed that survivors with PTSD had significantly less work potential post-accident than survivors without PTSD. Specific barriers to employability for survivors with PTSD identified by this study included high levels of depression, reduced time-management ability, and an over-concern or anxiety with physical injuries. Respondents with PTSD, however, reported significantly greater extrinsic motivation to work than those without PTSD. Early intervention and referral to occupational rehabilitation programs that: (1) help address these barriers to employability and stimulate the existing motivation to return to work, and (2) work alongside clinical treatment programs, may assist in the reduction of poor work outcomes that people with PTSD following road accidents often experience.

Introduction

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as defined in DSM-IV (APA, 1994) is characterized by intrusive, avoidance and hyperarousal symptoms that occur in response to experiencing a serious life event or threatening life circumstance. PTSD following road accidents has been reported as common, disabling and in some cases persistent over time (Blanchard & Veazey, 2001; Ursano et al., 1999). Some suggest that an individual with PTSD may experience 20 years of active symptoms and will experience almost 1 day per week of occupational impairment (Kessler, 2000).

While studies show that working contributes positively to post-trauma adjustment readjustment (Brown & Schulberg, 1995; Worthington, 1977), individuals with PTSD often have difficulties maintaining pre-trauma levels of work functioning (Blanchard et al., 1996a; Matthews, Chinnery, Blaszczynski, Silove, & Hillman, 2001). Some report that people with PTSD increase their work hours in an effort to hold off intrusive memories until their disorder makes it impossible to maintain employment (Bremner, Southwick, Darnell, & Charney, 1996). Others also provide evidence of people using their traumatic experience positively to motivate themselves to achieve in their careers (McFarlane & Yehuda, 1996).

Occupational psychologists and rehabilitation consultants who are involved in the provision of post-accident work adjustment services are increasingly being asked to provide occupational interventions and to suggest workplace accommodations that meet the specific needs of people with mental health disabilities (Houlihan & Reynolds, 2001). While there is a body of evidence identifying the negative influence of PTSD on occupational functioning generally (Blanchard et al., 1996a; Matthews et al., 2001; Mayou, Bryant, & Duthie, 1993), little empirical data exist on the components of work functioning that give rise to limitations in people with PTSD from which to develop such interventions (Matthews, 1999).

The present study investigated the components of work potential in people with PTSD with view to providing empirical data to both inform the conceptual development of work functioning in people with PTSD and to steer the development of appropriate early vocational interventions for this population.

Section snippets

Participants

Forty-six respondents (56% male) who had been admitted to a metropolitan public teaching hospital following a road accident during a retrospective 12 months period completed a postal survey on their recovery and work functioning at a mean of 8.6 months (SD=3.77) post-hospitalization. The respondents represented 41% of all road accident admissions to the hospital during a 12-months period that: (1) met eligibility criteria for the study, and (2) who did not have their invitation to participate

Post-traumatic stress responses

Blanchard, Jones–Alexander, Buckley, and Forneris (1996b) recommendations for diagnostic efficiency were used to identify PCL responses likely to be classified as PTSD (M=52.17, SD=10.24) and non-PTSD (M=27.34, SD=7.90). Table 1 provides the comparison of these groups on demographic and accident characteristics and includes the IES scores to corroborate the PCL groupings.

Groups were comparable on most of the variables except for pain where respondents with PTSD experienced significantly greater

Discussion

This study examined work potential in adult survivors of road accidents with PTSD approximately 8 months following their accident. Although a definite response rate could not be determined, the reported rate of 41% is similar to or higher than other Australian studies that have used postal surveys to gain information from hospital admission samples some months post-discharge (Bryant & Harvey, 1995; Jeavons, 1996). Importantly, respondents were obtained from a non-treatment-seeking,

References (30)

  • J.R. Crawford et al.

    Estimating premorbid IQ from demographic variablesA comparison of a regression equation vs. clinical judgement

    British Journal of Clinical Psychology

    (2001)
  • E.Y. Deykin et al.

    Posttraumatic stress disorder and the use of health services

    Psychosomatic Medicine

    (2001)
  • L. Greenspan et al.

    Abbreviated injury scale and injury severity scoreA scoring chart

    The Journal of Trauma

    (1985)
  • M.J. Horowitz et al.

    Stress response syndromes and their treatment

  • M.J. Horowitz et al.

    Impact of event scaleA measure of subjective stress

    Psychosomatic Medicine

    (1979)
  • Cited by (46)

    • The influence of emotion regulation on posttraumatic stress symptoms among Japanese people

      2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Second, many previous studies have examined a one-to-one association between specific ER skills (or a total score of various ER skills) and PTSS but do not consider the ER process. According to the Adaptive Coping with Emotions (ACE) model (Berking and Whitley, 2014), effective ER can be conceptualized as the situation-adapted interplay of the abilities to (a) be aware of emotions (e.g., Lischetzke and Eid, 2003; Subic-Wrana et al., 2005), (b) identify and label emotions (e.g., Barrett et al., 2001; Vine and Aldao, 2014), (c) correctly interpret emotion-related body sensations (e.g., Damasio, 1994; Marchesi et al., 2005), (d) understand the prompts of emotions (e.g., Southam-Gerow and Kendall, 2002), (e) actively modify negative emotions (e.g., Catanzaro and Greenwood, 1994; Salovey et al., 1995), (f) accept negative emotions when necessary (e.g., Braams et al., 2012; Leahy, 2002), (g) tolerate negative emotions when they cannot be changed (e.g., Kabat-Zinn, 2003; Kobasa et al., 1982), (h) confront (vs. avoid) distressing situations in order to attain important goals (e.g., Hayes et al., 1996; Margraf and Berking, 2005), and (i) compassionately support oneself when facing undesired emotions (e.g., Gilbert et al., 2006). A measure to assess these nine skills has been developed (Emotion-Regulation Skills Questionnaire: ERSQ; Berking and Znoj, 2008) and there is empirical evidence that these skills can be clustered in the two broader categories; (1) awareness and understanding skills (subscales a, b, c, d, and i of the above), and (2) acceptance and engagement skills (subscales e, f, g, and h of the above) (Fujisato et al., 2017).

    • Factors associated with physical, psychological and functional outcomes in adult trauma patients following Road Traffic Crash: A scoping literature review

      2019, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
      Citation Excerpt :

      Anxiety (Alghnam et al., 2015; Mayou and Bryant, 2002; Seethalakshmi et al., 2006), depression (Mayou and Bryant, 2002; Seethalakshmi et al., 2006), PTSD (Barth et al., 2005; Koren et al., 2001; Matthews, 2005; Seethalakshmi et al., 2006), limitations in daily life activity (Alghnam et al., 2015; Kelley-Quon et al., 2010), and pain (Alghnam et al., 2015; Nolet et al., 2010) have been associated with poor recovery following a crash. Further, physical injury, depression, over concern, anxiety, and reduced time management ability were barriers to gaining employment after an RTC (Matthews, 2005). Mental health issues (PTSD and depression) were associated with pain severity post the crash (Valentine et al., 2016).

    • Factors associated with non-return to work in the severely injured victims 3 years after a road accident: A prospective study

      2017, Accident Analysis and Prevention
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the present study, PTSD was significantly associated with non-return to work, in agreement with the literature. According to Matthews, survivors with PTSD were found to have significantly less work potential than those without PTSD (Matthews, 2005). Moreover, according to Opsteegh et al., pain, if uncontrolled and prolonged, may be an important stressor that could result in the development of PTSD (Opsteegh et al., 2009).

    • Life quality and rehabilitation after a road traffic crash: A literature review

      2016, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text