Child maltreatment deaths in the U.S. National Child Death Review Case Reporting System☆
Introduction
Child maltreatment (CM) deaths are uncommon sentinel events which offer insight into understanding and preventing abuse and neglect (King, Kiesel, & Simon, 2006). Despite repeated calls for action, at least 3,500 children continue to die from abuse and neglect every year in the industrialized world (UNICEF, 2003, U.S. Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect, 1995). Beyond fatality, deaths from child maltreatment impact living children, families and communities medically, emotionally and economically, contributing to a cycle of violence which has effects far beyond childhood (Anda, Butchart, Felitti, & Brown, 2010).
Low incidence rates, the myriad of potential causes, and our inability to accurately predict CM fatality in infants and young children have made prevention problematic (Jason and Andereck, 1983, Ross et al., 2009). Although certain patterns of death have been identified medically (e.g., abusive head trauma, blunt trauma, asphyxiation, poisoning, neglect; Arbogast et al., 2005, Fujiwara et al., 2009, Kasim et al., 1995, Klevens and Leeb, 2010, Knight and Collins, 2005, Lee and Lathrop, 2010, Ross et al., 2009, Yin, 2011), CM fatality is not solely a medical problem. Professionals in public health, education, criminal justice, and child welfare have increasingly important roles to play in identifying, reporting, investigating, responding to, and preventing child maltreatment fatality (Palusci & Haney, 2010).
It has been consistently estimated that 1–2 per 100,000 U.S. children annually are fatally maltreated (McClain et al., 1993, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011). In the United Kingdom, similar rates have been reported (Browne & Lynch, 1995). However, there have been persistent concerns about a systematic underascertainment of child maltreatment fatalities (Crume et al., 2002, Ewigman et al., 1993, Tursz et al., 2010, U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2011). In particular, correctly identifying deaths due to neglect is problematic (Asser and Swan, 1998, Knight and Collins, 2005, Palusci et al., 2010a), and children with sudden unexpected death or those with what appear to be unintentional causes on the surface often have preventable risk factors which are substantially similar to those in families with maltreatment (McKenzie et al., 2012, Overpeck et al., 2002, Schnitzer et al., 2011).
Family configuration, child gender, social isolation, lack of support, maternal youth, marital status, poverty, and parenting practices are thought to contribute to increased risk (Brewster et al., 1998, Jenny and Isaac, 2006, Rangel et al., 2010). For example, children residing in households with unrelated adults were significantly more likely to die from inflicted injuries than were children residing with two biologic parents, and increased risk was also elevated with step, foster, and adoptive parents (Schnitzer and Ewigman, 2005, Stiffman et al., 2002). Among newborns, 2.1 per 100,000 in North Carolina were killed or left to die each year, usually by their mothers, many of whom were poor, had no prenatal care, or were adolescents (Herman-Giddens et al., 1999). A review in the United Kingdom identified child age less than 5 years, nonorganic failure to thrive, prior abuse or unexplained injuries, caregiver youth, inexperience, mental illness, drug and alcohol abuse, stress and poverty as risk factors (Browne & Lynch, 1995). In one study from U.S. trauma centers, children with abusive injuries who did not have private insurance were 3.8 times more likely to die after controlling for race, injury severity and Glasgow Coma Scale scores, and although there were more African American deaths, race was not an independent predictor for mortality (Rangel et al., 2010). Higher rates of CM fatality were noted in the U.S. among boys (2.5 per 100,000), infants (18 per 100,000), at the hands of parents (88%), and among those with alcohol and drug abuse and domestic violence. In addition, 12% had received services within five years from child protective services (DHHS, 2011). A prior child protective services (CPS) report of maltreatment has been associated with almost 6 times the risk for death from later injury (Putnam-Hornstein, 2011).
Although community systems such as law enforcement, courts, public health, child welfare, and health care each respond to cases as they arise, they are not designed to accurately ascertain the correct numbers of victims across systems or to address broader issues of risk factors and prevention. Public health surveillance has been suggested as a means to more correctly identify and respond to child maltreatment fatalities (Schloesser et al., 1992, Smith et al., 2011), and several U.S. states began aggregating information about child homicide and linking data across systems (Fujiwara et al., 2009, Klevens and Leeb, 2010, Lyman et al., 2003, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011). Local multidisciplinary community reviews of child deaths have been identified as a key source of information for enhanced case identification and response (Bennett et al., 2006, Christian and Sege, 2010, Jenny and Isaac, 2006, National Center for Review and Prevention of Child Deaths, 2010, Onwuachi-Saunders et al., 1999).
Child death review teams (CDRTs) became a well-established process in many states in the last quarter of the 20th century as a mechanism to involve multiple professions in the review of maltreatment deaths (Durfee, Durfee, & West, 2002). Missouri became the first state to have comprehensive legislation for CDRTs and developed standards for investigation, reviews, and reporting. In 2012, all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and Guam had established review programs. A substantial proportion of all U.S. child deaths, ages 0–18, are now being reviewed (Brixey et al., 2011, Webster et al., 2003). These teams have had some success in better classifying deaths and in developing policies and programs to reduce further deaths and injuries (Douglas and Cunningham, 2008, Hochstadt, 2006, Johnston et al., 2011, Onwuachi-Saunders et al., 1999, Palusci et al., 2010b, Rimsza et al., 2002, Sanders et al., 1999, Schnitzer et al., 2008, Webster et al., 2003). Child death reviews have expanded to other countries and to other specialized reviews of unintentional deaths, perinatal deaths, and reviews for children within the child welfare system (Palusci, 2010, Schnitzer et al., 2011, Sidebotham et al., 2011).
It has been recommended that additional information and support would improve reviews and recommendations made by CDRTs (Wirtz et al., 2011, U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2011). To improve data collection about child maltreatment and non-homicide fatalities from child death reviews, the Maternal and Child Health Bureau of the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration funded the NCRPCD to create and implement a national data collection system for child death review information. The U.S. National Child Death Review Case Reporting System (NCDR-CRS) is an internet-based data reporting structure that has been used since 2005 among an increasing number of U.S. states (Covington, 2011). A detailed electronic data collection form guides child death review coordinators to enter case-specific information depending on the age, cause, and manner of death with the purpose of providing CDRTs with a simple method for capturing, analyzing, and reporting on the full set of information shared at a child death or serious injury review.
Information is assembled by the CDRT from medical examiners, vital statistics, police and child protection investigations, scene investigations, medical information, and other facts contributed by the team, which the CDRT enters into the form. The form also collects information about the opinions of teams regarding the preventability of deaths and activities recommended, planned, and/or carried out to prevent further deaths. Information entered into the NCDR-CRS is available to local child death review teams and can be aggregated for community-level and state-level reviews, reporting, and policy planning.
The objectives of this study are to (a) describe the case characteristics of child maltreatment deaths in a large U.S. population, (b) systematically assess risk factors and community responses as a result of those reviews, and (c) compare these case characteristics in NCDR-CRS with other published series.
Section snippets
NCRPCD's Child Death Review Case Reporting Form
NCRPCD developed the Child Death Review Case Reporting Form, with funding support from the U.S. Maternal and Child Health Bureau, to collect comprehensive information on child fatalities reviewed by state and local child death review teams. Each team chooses which cases to review and input into the system according to state and local law and CDRT policy and procedures. There is variation among states such that not all child deaths are necessarily reviewed and/or entered into the system.
The case
Results
As of July 1, 2012, there were 101,501 child death review reports in the NCDR-CRS from 37 U.S. States. Although a small number of near-fatalities were included, most (99%) of the records contained review information for deaths, and 45,947 (45%) were recorded by states as complete reviews during 2005–2009. Child maltreatment caused or contributed to 2,285 of the deaths recorded as complete during this period. Because an increasing number of states joined the Case Reporting System during the
Discussion
The NCDR-CRS contains a large number of CM cases from child death reviews in several U.S. states from its first five years of operation. Each complete case offers extensive information about investigation outcomes, risk factors, and actions recommended and/or taken by teams in response to a child's death. Over time, increasing numbers of reviews from a larger proportion of the United States will be deposited, which will offer a more representative picture of how and why children die related to
Conclusions
The NCDR-CRS offers an increasingly large repository for case information which can help communities understand, respond to, and prevent CM deaths. While not all CM deaths are reviewed in the 37 participating states, and the NCDR-CRS has not been implemented in all U.S. states and territories, the system nonetheless highlights a large population of CM deaths with potentially modifiable risk factors that can be the basis of future action. PA and AHT are associated with most abuse deaths, but
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Heather Dykstra, M.A., Esther Shaw, M.S., and Linda Potter, J.D. for their review of the manuscript and assistance with the dataset.
References (62)
- et al.
Building a framework for global surveillance of the public health implications of adverse childhood experiences
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
(2010) - et al.
Victim, perpetrator, family and incident characteristics of 32 infant maltreatment deaths in the United States Air Force
Child Abuse & Neglect
(1998) - et al.
Child fatality review: An international movement
Child Abuse & Neglect
(2002) - et al.
Fatal child abuse in Georgia: The epidemiology of severe physical child abuse
Child Abuse & Neglect
(1983) - et al.
Childhood deaths from physical abuse
Child Abuse & Neglect
(1995) - et al.
Prevalence of children with disabilities in the child welfare system and out of home placement: An examination of administrative records
Children and Youth Services Review
(2011) - et al.
Epidemiology of child homicide in Jefferson County, Alabama
Child Abuse & Neglect
(2003) - et al.
Predicting recurrence of child maltreatment in young children using NCANDS
Children & Youth Services Review
(2005) - et al.
Using capture–recapture methods to better ascertain the incidence of fatal child maltreatment
Child Abuse & Neglect
(2010) - et al.
Effects of a citizens review panel in preventing child maltreatment fatalities
Child Abuse & Neglect
(2010)
Pattern of injury in child fatalities resulting from child abuse
Forensic Science International
Child abuse fatalities and cases of extreme concern: Lessons from reviews
Child Abuse & Neglect
Active surveillance of child abuse fatalities
Child Abuse & Neglect
Fatal child maltreatment in England, 2005–2009
Child Abuse & Neglect
Child death review: The state of the nation
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Malicious use of nonpharmaceuticals in children
Child Abuse & Neglect
Abusive head trauma in infants and children
Pediatrics
Initial neurologic presentation in young children sustaining inflicted and unintentional fatal head injuries
Pediatrics
Child fatalities from religion-motivated medical neglect
Pediatrics
Homicide of children aged 0–4 years, 2003–04: Results from the National Violent Death Reporting System
Injury Prevention
Use of child death review to inform sudden unexplained infant deaths occurring in a large urban setting
Injury Prevention
Editorial: The nature and extent of child homicide and fatal abuse
Child Abuse Review
Policy statement – Child fatality review
Pediatrics
Non-accidental death
The U.S. National Child Death Review Case Reporting System
Injury Prevention
Underascertainment of child maltreatment fatalities by death certificates, 1990–1998
Pediatrics
Intensive home visiting is associated with decreased risk of infant death
Pediatrics
Recommendations from child fatality review teams: Results of a U.S. nationwide exploratory study concerning maltreatment fatalities and social service delivery
Child Abuse Review
The Missouri child fatality study: Underreporting of maltreatment fatalities among children younger than five years of age, 1983 through 1986
Pediatrics
Characteristics of infant homicides: Findings from a U.S. multisite reporting system
Pediatrics
Underascertainment of child abuse mortality in the United States
Journal of the American Medical Association
Cited by (83)
Social and demographic characteristics of child maltreatment fatalities among children ages 5–17 years
2023, Child Abuse and NeglectChild maltreatment
2023, Encyclopedia of Mental Health, Third Edition: Volume 1-3An Adaptive Machine Learning System for predicting recurrence of child maltreatment: A routine activity theory perspective
2021, Knowledge-Based SystemsCitation Excerpt :In other words, FOR represents the proportion of actual RCM victims who are nevertheless omitted by the system, with respect to all the predictions of non-RCM victims. Child maltreatment can be fatal to the victims [65]. Omitting a child who will be victimized can incur severe consequences to the child.
- ☆
This paper was presented, in part, on September 10, 2012 at the XIXth Congress of the International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect in Istanbul, Turkey. Major funding was provided for the U.S. National Child Death Review Case Reporting System by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (Title V, Social Security Act), Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services (grant 5 U49MCoo225-09-00) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Reproductive Health.