Original articleThe Lifetime Prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse and Sexual Assault Assessed in Late Adolescence
Section snippets
Participants
This analysis draws on three very similarly designed national telephone surveys: the Developmental Victimization Survey (2003) [12] and the National Survey of Children Exposed to Violence I (NatSCEV I) (2008) [13] and II (2011) [14]. The primary foundation of the design for all three studies was a nationwide sampling frame of residential telephone numbers from which a sample of telephone households was drawn by random digit dialing. All regions and geographical settings had an equal chance of
Results
Table 1 lists lifetime estimates for contact sexual abuse/assault for the 15-, 16-, and 17-year-olds from three combined national samples in 2003, 2008, and 2011.
The lifetime rate increased for each additional year of experience among this older youth cohort. So the experience of any sexual abuse/assault among females rose from 16.8% (95% CI 11.5–22.2) for 15-year-olds to 21.7% (95% CI 16.3–27.0) for 16-year-olds to 26.6% (95% CI 19.8–33.5) for 17-year-olds. For males, it rose from 4.3% (95% CI
Discussion
For those seeking an estimate of exposure for a recent cohort of young people to sexual abuse and sexual assault over the course of childhood, the findings here suggest that it is likely to be undercounted in a sample of mixed-age older youth. Given the rise with each additional year from 15 to 17, it would be best to base estimates on youth at the very end of childhood, which in this sample would be the 17-year-olds for whom this analysis provided an estimate of 26.6% for females and 5.1% for
Funding Sources
For the purposes of compliance with Section 507 of PL 104-208 (the “Stevens Amendment”), readers are advised that funding was derived from multiple sources. This project was supported by federal Grant numbers 2006-JW-BX-0003 and 2009-JW-BX-0018 awarded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice. The total amount of federal funding involved is $2,850,814.
References (22)
- et al.
The prevalence of child sexual abuse: Integrative review adjustment for potential response and measurement biases
Child Abuse Neglect
(1997) - et al.
The prevalence of child sexual abuse in community and student samples: A meta-analysis
Clin Psychol Rev
(2009) - et al.
The JVQ: Reliability, validity, and national norms
Child Abuse Neglect
(2005) - Darkness to Light. How prevalent is child sexual abuse? 2013. Cited; Available at:...
- et al.
Prevalence of child sexual abuse: A corrective meta-analysis
Social Serv Rev
(1999) - et al.
A global perspective on child abuse: Meta-analysis of prevalence around the world
Child Maltreat
(2011) - et al.
The current prevalence of child sexual abuse worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Int J Public Health
(2013) - et al.
Female victims of sexual violence, 1994–2010. Special report
(2013) - et al.
A longitudinal perspective on dating violence among adolescent and college-age women
Am J Public Health
(2003) - et al.
Adolescents' experiences of sexual assault by peers: Prevalence and nature of victimization occurring within and outside of school
J Youth Adolescence
(2009)
Sex between young teens and older individuals: A demographic portrait. Child trends research brief, Publication #2005-07
Cited by (421)
The prevalence of child sexual abuse with online sexual abuse added
2024, Child Abuse and NeglectPrevalence of violence against children in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2023, Child Abuse and NeglectThe public's knowledge about child sexual abuse influences its perceptions of prevention and associated policies
2023, Child Abuse and NeglectViolence against women in the US: Theory, research and policy
2024, Violence Against Women in the US: Theory, Research and Policy
Disclaimer: Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the US Department of Justice.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.