Abstract
This study examines the features of effective school-based prevention of crime, substance use, dropout/nonattendance, and other conduct problems. It summarizes, using meta-analytic techniques, results from 165 studies of school-based prevention activities that ranged from individual counseling or behavior modification programs through efforts to change the way schools are managed. The results highlight several inadequacies in the existing research for guiding policy and practice, the most notable of which is that many popular school-based prevention approaches have not been well studied to date. The study shows, however, that school-based prevention practices appear to be effective in reducing alcohol and drug use, dropout and nonattendance, and other conduct problems. The size of the average effect for each of the four outcomes was small and there was considerable heterogeneity across studies in the magnitude of effects, even within program type after adjusting for measured method and population differences. Non-cognitive-behavioral counseling, social work, and other therapeutic interventions show consistently negative effects, whereas self-control or social competency promotion instruction that makes use of cognitive-behavioral and behavioral instructional methods show consistently positive effects. Also effective are noninstructional cognitive-behavioral and behavioral methods programs. Environmentally focused interventions appear to be particularly effective for reducing delinquency and drug use.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Botvin, G. J. (1990). Substance abuse prevention: Theory, practice, and effectiveness. In Tonry, M., and Wilson, J. Q. (eds.), Crime and Justice: A Reû iew of the Research: Vol. 13. Drugs and Crime, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 461–519.
Botvin, G. J., Schinke, S., and Orlandi, M. A. (1995). School-based health promotion: Substance abuse and sexual behavior. Appl. Preû . Psychol. 4: 167–184.
Bry, B. H. (1982). Reducing the incidence of adolescent problems through preventive intervention: One-and five-year follow-up. Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 106(3): 265–276.
Bry, B. H., and George, F. E. (1979). Evaluating and improving prevention programs: A strategy from drug abuse. Eû al. Prog. Planning 2: 127–136.
Bry, B. H., and George, F. E. (1980). The preventive effects of early intervention on the attendance and grades of urban adolescents. Professional Psychology 11: 252–260.
Catalano, R. F., Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., Berglund, L., and Olson, J. J. (1998). Comprehensive community-and school-based interventions to prevent antisocial behavior. In Loeber, R., and Farrington, D. P. (eds.), Serious and Violent Juû enile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interû entions, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 248–283.
Dryfoos, J. G. (1990). Adolescents at Risk: Preû alence and Preû ention, Oxford University Press, New York.
Durlak, J. A. (1995). School-Based Preû ention Programs for Children and Adolescents, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Ennett, S. T., Tobler, N. S., Ringwalt, C. L., and Flewelling, R. L. (1994). How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of Project D.A.R.E. outcome evaluations, Am. J. Public Health 84: 1394–1401.
Gerstein, D. R., and Green, L. W. (eds.). (1993). Preû enting Drug Abuse: What Do We Know? National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Gleser, L. J., and Olkin, I. (1994). Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In Cooper, H., and Hedges, L. V. (eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 339–355.
Gottfredson, D. C. (1997). School-based crime prevention. In Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D. C., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., and Bushway, S. (eds.), Preû enting Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising: A Report to the United States Congress. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC, pp. 5.1–5.71.
Gottfredson, D. C. (2001). Schools and Delinquency, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Gottfredson, G. D., Gottfredson, D. C., Czeh, E. R., Cantor, D., Crosse, S., and Hantman, I. (2000). A National Study of Delinquency Preû ention in Schools, Gottfredson Associates, Ellicott City, MD.
Gottfredson, D. C., Wilson, D. B., and Najaka. School-based crime prevention. In Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B., and Mackenzie, D. C., New York (eds.), Eû idence-Based Crime Preû ention, Harwood Academic (in press).
Hansen, W. B. (1992). School-based substance abuse prevention: A review of the state of the art in curriculum: 1980- 1990. Health Educ. Res. 7: 403–430.
Hansen, W. B., and O'Malley, P. M. (1996). Drug use. In DiClemente, R. J., Hansen, W. B., and Ponton, L. E. (eds.), Handbook of Adolescent Health Risk Behaû ior, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 161–192.
Hawkins, J. D., Arthur, M. W., and Catalano, R. F. (1995). Preventing substance abuse. In Tonry, M., and Farrington, D. P. (eds.), Crime and Justice: A Reû iew of the Research: Vol. 19. Building a Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Preû ention, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 343–427.
Hawkins, J. D., Farrington, D. P., and Catalano, R. F. (1998). Reducing violence through the schools. In Elliott, D. S., Hamburg, B. A., and Williams, K. R. (eds.), Violence in American Schools, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 188–216.
Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. J. Educ. Stat. 6: 107–128.
Hedges, L. V., and Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis, Academic Press, New York.
Huizinga, D., and Jakob-Chien, C. (1998). The contemporaneous co-occurrence of serious and violent juvenile offending and other problem behaviors. In Loeber, R., and Farrington, D. P. (eds.), Serious and Violent Juû enile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interû entions, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 47–67.
Institute of Medicine (1994). Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preû entiû e Interû ention Research, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Johnston, L. D., Bachman, J. G., and O'Malley, P. M. (1997). Monitoring the Future: Questionnaire Responses from the Nation's High School Seniors, 1995, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., and Bachman, J. G. (1999). Drug Trends in 1999 Are Mixed, University of Michigan News and Information Services, Ann Arbor, Dec. [on-line]. Available at www.monitoringthefuture.org; accessed 3/3/00.
Kalaian, H. A., and Raudenbush, S. W. (1996). A multivariate mixed linear model for metaanalysis. Psychol. Methods 1: 227–235.
Kraemer, H. C., Gardner, C., Brooks, J. O., III, and Yesavage, J. A. (1998). Advantages of excluding underpowered studies in meta-analysis: Inclusionist versus exclusionist viewpoints. Psychol. Methods 3: 23–31.
Light, R. J., and Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Summing Up: The Science of Reû iewing Research, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In Cook, T. D., Cooper, H., Cordray, D. S., Hartmann, H., Hedges, L. V., Light, R. J., Louis, T. A., and Mosteller, F. (eds.), Meta-Analysis for Explanation, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 83–127.
Lipsey, M. W., and Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In Loeber, R., and Farrington, D. P. (eds.), Serious and Violent Juû enile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interû entions, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 86–105.
Lipsey, M. W., and Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. Am. Psychol. 48: 1181–1209.
Lipsey, M. W., and Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical Meta-Analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Lochman, J. E. (1985). Effects of different treatment lengths in cognitive behavioral interventions with aggressive boys. Child Psychiatry Hum. Deû . 16: 45–56.
Lochman, J. E. (1992). Cognitive-behavioral intervention with aggressive boys: Three-year follow-up and preventive effects. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 60: 426–432.
Lochman, J. E., and Curry, J. F. (1986). Effects of social problem-solving training and selfinstruction training with aggressive boys. J. Clin. Child Psychol. 15: 159–164.
Lochman, J. E., Burch, P. R., Curry, J. F., and Lampron, L. B. (1984). Treatment and generalization effects of cognitive-behavioral and goal-setting interventions with aggressive boys. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 52: 915–916.
Lochman, J. E., Lampron, L. B., Gemmer, T. C., Harris, S. R., and Wyckoff, G. M. (1989). Teacher consultation and cognitive-behavioral interventions with aggressive boys. Psychol. Schools 26: 179–188.
Norman, E., and Turner, S. (1993). Adolescent substance abuse prevention programs: Theories, models, and research in the encouraging 80's. J. Primary Preû . 14: 320.
Raudenbush, S. W. (1994). Random effects models. In Cooper, H., and Hedges, L. V. (eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 301–321.
Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In Cooper, H., and Hedges, L. V. (eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 231–244.
Samples, F. and Aber, L. (1998). Evaluations of school-based violence prevention programs. In Elliott, D. S., Hamburg, B. A., and Williams, K. R. (eds.), Violence in American Schools, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 217–252.
Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D. C., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., and Bushway, S. (1997). Preû enting Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising: A Report to the United States Congress, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC.
Stage, S. A., and Quiroz, D. R. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings. School Psychol. Reû . 26: 333–368.
Tobler, N. S. (1986). Meta-analysis of 143 adolescent drug prevention programs: Quantitative outcome results of program participants compared to a control or comparison group. J. Drug Issues 16: 537–567.
Tobler, N. S. (1992). Drug prevention programs can work: Research findings. J. Addict. Dis. 11: 128.
Tobler, N. S., and Stratton, H. H. (1997). Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: A meta-analysis of the research. J. Primary Preû . 18: 71–128.
Tremblay, R. E., and Craig, W. M. (1995). Developmental crime prevention. In Tonry, M., and Farrington, D. P. (eds.), Crime and Justice: A Reû iew of the Research: Vol. 19. Building a Safer Society; Strategic Approaches to Crime Preû ention, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 151–236.
Wilson, D. B. (1995). The Role of Method in Treatment Effect Estimates: Eû idence from Psychological, Behaû ioral, and Educational Treatment Interû ention Meta-Analyses, Doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, D.B., Gottfredson, D.C. & Najaka, S.S. School-Based Prevention of Problem Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 17, 247–272 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011050217296
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011050217296