Informed consent: assessment of comprehension

Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Nov;155(11):1508-11. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.11.1508.

Abstract

Objective: The authors designed and evaluated a structured and rigorous informed consent procedure involving subjects with schizophrenia.

Method: Informed consent forms were read and explained to 49 schizophrenic patients participating in ongoing clinical treatment research trials. The subjects answered a questionnaire relating to each research protocol. Protocol procedures were reiterated until the patients answered 100% of the questions correctly. Subjects were asked the same questions 7 days later to ascertain how much of the information they had retained.

Results: The patients' median score on the first trial of the informed consent questionnaire was 80% correct. To achieve 100% correct responses, 53% of the patients required a second trial of the questionnaire, and 37% of them required three or more trials. Scores improved between the first trial and the trial on day 7. Ninety-six percent of the subjects felt adequately informed, 66% reported participating in the research protocol for personal reasons, and 34% reported participating at the suggestion of others.

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that when adequate informed consent procedures are established, schizophrenic research subjects are able to understand and retain critical components of informed consent information.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Attitude
  • Clinical Protocols
  • Cognition*
  • Comprehension*
  • Consent Forms
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Forensic Psychiatry
  • Humans
  • Informed Consent*
  • Male
  • Mental Competency
  • Mentally Ill Persons*
  • Middle Aged
  • Research Subjects
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Schizophrenia / diagnosis*
  • Schizophrenia / drug therapy
  • Schizophrenic Psychology*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires