Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
  • Log out
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherJOURNAL ARTICLE

"The whole truth" versus "the admissible truth": an ethics dilemma for expert witnesses

TG Gutheil, M Hauser, MS White, G Spruiell and LH Strasburger
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online December 2003, 31 (4) 422-427;
TG Gutheil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M Hauser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MS White
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G Spruiell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LH Strasburger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The expert witness testifies under oath to tell "the whole truth," yet certain aspects of the legal system itself make this ideal difficult or impossible. The authors present both a philosophical and a practical discussion of the challenges for the expert in attaining this goal. After review of oaths in general and truth-telling in particular, real-life examples are provided to examine the vicissitudes of the whole truth in court. Recommendations are provided for experts, to preserve the truth in the adversary system.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 31 (4)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 31, Issue 4
1 Dec 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
"The whole truth" versus "the admissible truth": an ethics dilemma for expert witnesses
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
"The whole truth" versus "the admissible truth": an ethics dilemma for expert witnesses
TG Gutheil, M Hauser, MS White, G Spruiell, LH Strasburger
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2003, 31 (4) 422-427;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
"The whole truth" versus "the admissible truth": an ethics dilemma for expert witnesses
TG Gutheil, M Hauser, MS White, G Spruiell, LH Strasburger
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2003, 31 (4) 422-427;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Alcoholic blackout for criminally relevant behavior
  • Police responses to persons with mental illness: does the label matter?
  • Ethics questions raised by the neuropsychiatric, neuropsychological, educational, developmental, and family characteristics of 18 juveniles awaiting execution in Texas
Show more JOURNAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law