Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
  • Log out
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Book ReviewBooks and Media

Tiger King: When the Fascination Fades, What Can We Learn from Joe Exotic et al?

Chandler Hicks and Cathleen Cerny-Suelzer
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2021, 49 (3) 456-457; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.210093-21
Chandler Hicks
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cathleen Cerny-Suelzer
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Directed by Eric Goode, Rebecca Chaiklin. Original Release Date: March 20, 2020.
  • cyberbully
  • toxic masculinity
  • murder for hire

Directed by Eric Goode and Rebecca Chaiklin and released March 20, 2020, on Netflix, the seven-part series Tiger King details the niche community of big cat collectors and conservationists by focusing on four individuals: Joe Exotic, Carole Baskin, Bhagavan “Doc” Antle, and Jeff Lowe. The notoriety of the show led to many proposed spin-offs, including the planned CBS adaptation starring Nicolas Cage as Joe Exotic. Why did Tiger King capture the fascination of a nation in lockdown? In addition to its colorful personalities, perhaps it is the extreme measures big cat enthusiasts will take to protect their livelihood, including stalking, cyberbullying, and murder for hire. Tiger King is toxic masculinity in tiger's stripes.

The titular star of the series is the Tiger King himself, Joe Maldonado-Passage (née Schreibvogel), aka Joe Exotic. Mr. Exotic is the former owner of G.W. Zoo in Wynnewood, Oklahoma, which at one point housed over 227 big cats and 50 species of animals. Joe captures the audience with his polarizing personality. Dressed in flamboyant sequined button-ups, Joe is not your typical conservative Oklahoman. He is a homosexual, polygamist, former presidential and gubernatorial candidate who uses his grandiose persona to blur the lines between reality and absurdism. Known for breeding big cats and hosting cub petting events, Joe draws the attention of animal rights activists, who view his activities as animal exploitation.

One of Joe's harshest critics is Carole Baskin, owner of Big Cat Rescue in Tampa Bay, Florida. Dressed in leopard print and flower crowns, Carole draws in viewers with her unassuming yet superficial kindness and the dark mystery of her second husband's disappearance. Did Carole Baskin kill her husband and feed him to her tigers? We may never know, but a spirited debate about it rages online. While Carole and Joe denigrate each other, viewers are introduced to a third, equally enticing big cat collector, Bhagavan “Doc” Antle, owner of Myrtle Beach Safari. When he is not wrangling exotic animals for the likes of Britney Spears, Doc is using big cats to lure young women to his “harem” where they take care of the animals' needs and allegedly, some of Doc's other needs. Finally, there is the would-be-savior of G.W. Zoo, biker-jacket-loving, alleged ex-wife abuser Jeff Lowe. Mr. Lowe makes no apologies for living life to the fullest or for wanting an attractive nanny for his newborn. His involvement with the zoo leads to Joe Exotic's eventual undoing on many levels. Most significantly, Mr. Lowe helps bring to light Joe's plan to have Carole Baskin murdered.

Viewers watch as Carole wages a war against Joe's breeding and cub petting activities through her social media platforms. He responds as a quintessential internet troll by using his own web series to increasingly cyberbully Carole, leaving a trail of hate that helped bring about his eventual demise. Joe's efforts to bully Carole include verbal threats of violence, music videos featuring Carole look-alikes engaged in questionable activities, and perhaps most condemning of all, a video of Joe shooting the head off a “Carole” blowup doll.

The courts have recently addressed cyberbullying, as it has become a more prevalent problem in the digital age. In U.S. v. Sayer, 748 F.3d 425 (1st Cir. 2014) and Elonis v. U.S., 135 S. Ct. 2001 (2015),1 the central question became delineating between free speech, “true threats,” and intent. In Joe's case he was not formally charged with cyberbullying, however, his online persona became a prominent factor in his eventual conviction for the murder for hire of Carole. Joe Exotic's behaviors, and the behaviors of many other male characters in Tiger King, are reminiscent of Incel and similar online communities where large cohorts of males use the internet as a sounding board for their misogynistic views and inciting (intentionally or not) violent outbursts. Incel stands for “involuntary celibates” and the most infamous incel was likely Elliot Rodger. In 2014, Mr. Rodger killed six people and injured several more in Isla Vista, California. The motive for Mr. Rodger's attack was retribution for rejection by women.2 A recent linguistic analysis concluded approximately 30 percent of online Incel threads contained misogynistic verbiage.3 Although Joe Exotic's anger toward Carole was not based on sexual rejection by women, his tirades against her certainly echo the type of misogyny Incels and similar groups post online. Several other male Tiger King cast members also appear to hold misogynistic views toward women, contributing to an unchecked negative valence system. These communities breed negativity, which causes an echo chamber of anger, escalating to online threats of violence, and eventually may move beyond the keyboard as in the cases of Joe Exotic, Elliot Rodger, and others.

For the forensic psychiatrist, Tiger King can serve as a study in toxic masculinity. As demonstrated above, the male characters from the docuseries exhibit personality traits representative of other harmful subcultures, such as the Incels. Through their grandiose schemes, these individuals manipulate and hurt the people around them. Big cats are used as bait to draw in susceptible and easily controlled younger individuals. For Joe, this meant using big cats, money, drugs, and other superficial objects to attract younger men. For Bhagavan, this meant using big cats as a pretext to draw in young females whom he “mentors” over many years and makes dependent on him for food, clothing, and shelter. Similarly, Jeff uses the flashy intoxicating power of big cats to engage in dubious business ventures and attract desirable women. The perspective of these men can be summed up with a quote from the series by Doc Antle, “men are pigs and women are sheep.”

What should not be lost in this cult of personalities is the exploitation of big cats and the saddening fact that more tigers exist in captivity in the United States (5,000–10,000) than in their natural habitat (4,000). What begins as a selfless motive to help big cats turns into a vicious power-hungry struggle. Big cats become the conduit for these toxic males to feed their egos. Over time, this subculture moves beyond a hobby or altruistic endeavor and into a world of obsession. The audience observes changes in behavior, increased tolerance, cravings, and withdrawal symptoms, similar to addiction, eventually leading to criminal behavior. As a result, the male characters' identities appear strongly affiliated with this niche culture of big cat ownership. When Carole challenges their masculinity, we see an outcry of aggression and attempts to reassert dominance, consistent with the behavior of young boys and Incels.4 Forensic psychiatrists may benefit from the series by expanding their working knowledge of toxic masculinity and its various forms of expression given its propensity to incite violence. What is becoming clear in popular media is that the internet has become one of the largest and easiest realms in which to express toxic masculinity. Thus, psychiatrists may be increasingly tasked with completing violence risk assessments related to cyberbullying or online stalking or be asked to opine on the manner in which cyber activities may constitute or contribute to criminal behavior.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: None.

  • © 2021 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Choi K,
    2. Nair M
    : Cyberstalking and the Internet age. Principles and Practice of Forensic Psychiatry 65:675–80, 2017
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Duke A
    : Timeline to “Retribution”: Isla Vista attacks planned over years. CNN, March 27, 2014. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2014/05/26/justice/california-elliot-rodger-timeline/index.html. Accessed May 15, 2020
  3. 3.↵
    1. Jaki S,
    2. De Smedt T,
    3. Gwóźdź M,
    4. et al
    : Online hatred of women in the Incel.me forum: linguistic analysis and automatic detection. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:240–68, 2019
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Pellegrini AD,
    2. Bartini M
    : Dominance in early adolescent boys: affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 47:142–63, 2001
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 49 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 49, Issue 3
1 Sep 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tiger King: When the Fascination Fades, What Can We Learn from Joe Exotic et al?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Tiger King: When the Fascination Fades, What Can We Learn from Joe Exotic et al?
Chandler Hicks, Cathleen Cerny-Suelzer
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2021, 49 (3) 456-457; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.210093-21

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Tiger King: When the Fascination Fades, What Can We Learn from Joe Exotic et al?
Chandler Hicks, Cathleen Cerny-Suelzer
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2021, 49 (3) 456-457; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.210093-21
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Review of Anatomy of a Fall
  • A Forensic Review of Juror #2
  • Bright Young Women, Serial Killers, and the 1970s
Show more Books and Media

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • cyberbully
  • toxic masculinity
  • murder for hire

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law